Nevermind the armor, what the hell is the deal with that hideous warhammer?frankthedm said:
Derren said:The quality (lighting, etc.) of the picture is of course better than the 3E ones, no question but the Subject (Tarrasque) is imo very lacking. It simply has no trademark feature which, when you see the picture, tells you that this is the Tarrasque. In 3E it was the carapace which defined the look of the Tarrasque. In 4E such a defining feature simply lacks and the Tarrasque looks like any other big lizard monster.
Sonny said:Is it me, or does that tarrasque look rather happy go lucky? There's just something about him that looks pleased. Anyways, it's a good picture.![]()
frankthedm said:
Klaus said:Nevermind the armor, what the hell is the deal with that hideous warhammer?
I think the awe inspiring part is when it stomps your buddy flat...Spatula said:It's a nice enough piece of art, but it looks like a giant lizard with horns, which is hardly awe- (or fear-) inspiring.
That's so she can tenderize the meat without spilling its blood all over the place.Klaus said:Nevermind the armor, what the hell is the deal with that hideous warhammer?