Mustrum_Ridcully
Legend
Kruthiks look good (or nasty) to me.
The wargs, while cool, were a bit too hyena-like for me. For a worg, I'd make them smaller (larger than normal wolves, but not by much) and with more fur (and darker fur, gray or black).Edwin_Su said:with the worg art i think it's just a idea of what a worrg coeld look like, you coeld use the stats and give it any look you like as long as the creature is simular in shape and has the same attack modes.
personaly i kind of like the lotr worgs http://www.sideshowtoy.com/mas_assets/jpg/9342_image01.jpg
small pumpkin man said:Kruthiks
[sblock][/sblock]![]()
A bit too much "mud coloured" for me. Doesn't really stand out.
chaotix42 said:Well I like the new worg but it looks almost exactly like the guulvorg from MMV...
It's a mutated, goblin raised, inbred worg. Compare a chihuahua to a wolf. Now make it a Great Dane sized chihuahua with a bit of far realms taint. Voila!Bagpuss said:Clearly not a worg, but spot on for a guulvorg. What I didn't realise (not owning MMV) is they are a huge variant of the worg, if that's the case why does it look so different?
I also heartlily approve of this manticore.Zamkaizer said:I was greatly afeared when I saw its execrable D&D Miniatures illustration, but today's Manticore art is delicious.
It also represents a nice counterpoint to the warg, being a return to a more traditional form of an iconic monster, instead of a moving away from one.