Underneath his NDA, if nowhere else.ZetaStriker said:Not trying to doubt you Mouse, but where did we see that? I hadn't heard of it popping up again.

Underneath his NDA, if nowhere else.ZetaStriker said:Not trying to doubt you Mouse, but where did we see that? I hadn't heard of it popping up again.
doctorhook said:Underneath his NDA, if nowhere else.![]()
themilkman said:The fighter from KoTS is allowed to make opportunity attacks against shifting adjacent baddies (or baddies who attack someone other than the fighter) but it doesn't say that these attacks prevent the actions that triggered them.
inkmonkeys said:Those aren't opportunity attacks.
themilkman said:Very true! They are basic melee attacks made as immediate interrupts, clearly. I'm not sure how I could miss something so obvious.
Stalker0 said:Believe me its not. I think that has been teh number 1 source of confusion for people playing the DDXP pregens.
If that ability is still in the 4e books, enworld should just put a sticky up on day 1 and get it over with because I promise the flood of questions about that same thing will come.
It would've helped a lot if they'd just added a few words along the lines of "This basic attack does not count as an opportunity attack."Mouseferatu said:It is indeed a funky way of phrasing things. But it's an important distinction. Because fighters have abilities that trigger on opportunity attacks, it's very important to establish that the fighter's free attack against marked foes who shift isn't an OA, even if it seems like one in most respects.