talien
Community Supporter
Hysterical? Yes. Misleading? No.Garnfellow said:No question that the passage you've cited is an editing atrocity on oh so many levels, but your thread title is just a tad bit hysterical and somewhat misleading, don't you think?
I'll take your word that many of the d20 mechanical pieces are awful. If your cited passage is somehow representational of the other d20 sidebars, that's completely unacceptable and I'll gladly join you on the barricades.
But come on, the d20 mechanical sidebars are a pretty small part and of the whole book. I've been reading through everything BUT the mechanics and the editing of what I've read has been pretty good, if not excellent.
But this thread title makes it sound like the whole danged book is screwed up worse than the first printing of Mongoose's Conan book, which was probably the d20 low tide mark for editing.
My cited passage is indeed representational of the other d20 sidebars. It is completely unacceptable, and I invite you to join me at the barricades.
But really, this is the last d20 Cthulhu-type project we'll probably ever see, so there's nothing to barricade, I'm afraid.
As you said, the rest of the book IS excellent. So that only makes the stark contrast of horribly edited d20 stuff even more insulting. They can do a better job, they DID a better job, and yet chose not to for the d20 stuff.
For purposes of my use, apparently one of the few who bought it for use in a d20 campaign and plan to use the statistics in this new version, these errors most definitely screw up the "whole danged book" for me.