Wolfspider said:Hmm. Interesting, then, that halflings have existed for so long in D&D as basically hobbit-clones then, ain't it?
…I can think of another word for it.
Wolfspider said:Hmm. Interesting, then, that halflings have existed for so long in D&D as basically hobbit-clones then, ain't it?
Not for the last 7 years and counting.Wolfspider said:Hmm. Interesting, then, that halflings have existed for so long in D&D as basically hobbit-clones then, ain't it?
Hussar said:Or, given the choice between playing Conan or Arthur Dent, people are just lining up to play gormless, feckless, useless individuals.
Kobold Avenger said:I think the choice should be, would you rather play Aunt May or Iceman?
Fallen Seraph said:I personally prefer no negatives simply because since the base-stat: 8 is for your average person and the races closer in size, then it be weird that there would be such a HUGE discrepancy between the strength of a human and a halfling. Now this would make sense for a Minotaur but then they would have a natural strength bonus.
Huh. I guess the two of you have mental images of halflings that don't match mine...Cthulhudrew said:Yes. It's silly that chimpanzees are roughly 4 times stronger than an average human as well.
smetzger said:This is something that I really didn't understand, especially with 3e. LoTR was coming out and they decide to remove "chubby" and "hairy feet" as descriptors for halflings.