Grazzt said:Unfortunately Boz-man, the aforementioned beings won't be in the new DDG. Not sure what WotC has planned for them (well, not entirely anyway), but DDG isn't part of the "master plan"![]()
ColonelHardisson said:Ah, so it's Greyhawk, Greek, Norse, and Egyptian pantheons. I'm a bit disappointed that they didn't try to cover all the pantheons from the 1e version, but perhaps with the guidelines I assume will be in this edition we can convert the missing pantheons to 3e.
Upper_Krust said:The bad; that many people were looking forward to these beings (Demon Princes et al.) and that if indeed they are to be detailed in a future product - such work is a long way away (since it hasn't been mentioned) - unless of course they plan on detailing them in the Epic Level Handbook!? Which would be quite a surprise!![]()
BOZ said:ye got a point there krusty, it says 4 pantheons and over 70 GODS, but the beings in question are neither gods, nor part of a pantheon.![]()
Davelozzi said:There's also a chance that they could appear in Monster Manual II. After all, the demon princes and dukes of hell were orginally in the 1e Monster Manuals, plus MM2 is supposed to have a focus on higher CR creatures.
Originally posted by jasamcarl
Upper Krust....haven't seen you on a board since i departed for springbreak after that last D+D thread.
Originally posted by jasamcarl
And again i must state that i think your aggressive speculation fails to satisfy my fetish with rational extrapolation.....but hey, who reads a BBoard for grounded analysis?![]()
Davelozzi said:
There's also a chance that they could appear in Monster Manual II. After all, the demon princes and dukes of hell were orginally in the 1e Monster Manuals, plus MM2 is supposed to have a focus on higher CR creatures.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.