Actually I thought that nunchuka gave a +2 bonus and sai gave a +4 bonus to disarm. I still agree that it doesn't make much sense that weapons that are very well suited to disarming are less useful than large weapons that aren't. That is just a complaint I have and I don't think there is anything that can be done except for making house rules. If I had written the stats on those weapons I would have given a +5 or a +6 bonus to overcome the -4 penalty to being a light weapon. It is hard enough to find a weapon as a monk that won't constantly be neglected due to dealing more damage when unarmed.xenoflare said:Hmm, interesting discussion..
To all the mighty rules gurus, i have a bit of a query to throw in as well about disarming. What use is a Sai (from OA) for disarming, if light weapons suffer a -4 to disarm? Admittedly, my monk could use two sai to do a double-handed disarm to negate the -4 penalty if i was to use the optional Sword and Fist rules about two-fisted disarms, and the Sai +2 bonus to disarm checks would kick in... but won't i be much better off using a quarterstaff, a spear, or some other two-handed weapon for the two-handed +4 bonus?