Yeah, I like that one. I liked the W. Reynolds "hill giant" pick that was posted earlier, too (but didn't like the Reynolds spiky armor chick or the Elmore chick with weird-headed dragon).Moon-Lancer said:Yeah WOW. that is really good. nothing jumps out at me as wrong or bad. give me some more of that in your next books WOTC, PLEASE!!!
Agreed. And Eberron reminds me of Poochy with it's explicit emphasis on "attitude".As for 3e, to quote The Simpsons, the whole thing smacks of effort -- trying way too hard to tart up the visuals to get those edgy Gen X kids not to feel embarassed to play D&D. It already looks dated -- the punky hair, the oft-mentioned spikes and straps. I hope that for 4e, WotC goes for a classic, clean, timeless look with a light touch and plenty of humor.
Hussar said:Razz - a while ago there was a thread about anime in D&D art and I asked there for examples and no one could come up with any. I'm curious too what you think looks anime'ish.
roguerouge said:I'll say this much: I do understand why art work is an important part of the dnd imaginative experience. I definitely like that dnd has evolved into its own world, as a previous poster put it. But two subgenres of art work within that world that annoy me: the incredibly embarrassing Larry Elmore subgenre (a style that makes introducing adults to dnd that much harder) and this genre:
Divine Crusader: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/cd_gallery/81344.jpg
Rainbow Servant: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/cd_gallery/81353.jpg
Vadania's Menagerie: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/cd_gallery/82295.jpg
Frenzied Berzerker: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/cw_ag/75409.jpg
Evidently, I just dislike Ron Spencer's work. Is it a neo-southwestern thing?
Can we have someone defend this stuff? 'Cause I don't get it. These kinds of illustrations actually make me not want to play the class that they depict...
Hussar said:Just out of curiousity, because this pic:
http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/c...lery/100497.jpg
was one of the ones posted by Dyne. How is that pic so much different that this one:
This pic from Biblioodyssey
I'm not seeing the problem here.
Or possibly This pic from the same place. How is that vastly different from much of the art we see in 3e?
The first link doesn't work, so I'm not sure what image I originally posted that you're referring to. As for the other ones, you managed to find some truly hideous (IMHO) Medieval/Renaissance art. I'd honestly rather see a bunch of spikes and straps than those horrible frills. I appreciate the elegance and flowing-nature of some Medieval/Renaissance styles, but I could never stand the frills.
Hussar said:Fair enough, but your point has changed. Your original point was that 3e art was too far removed from medieval looks. But, compared to actual medieval art, the looks aren't actually too far off.
Hussar said:We can't all like the same thing. But, and this is a big but, there's a world of difference between saying, "I don't like this." and "I don't like this therefore it's crap."
I like art based on JRR Tolkien's work.Dyne said:it's a medieval fantasy game that tries to not look medieval.