Dismissing flying mount

[insanogeddon]

ring (s) of counter spells !!

You have taken a pov. vow ya bum, ur mount hasn't.. horsey earings if must but 2 rings of counter spells go a long way.

Re-allocate wealth. Deck out your mount.



Or/And give a party member a Pearl of Power for d.anchor. Reallocate Wealth thru others to you.

 

[irdeggman]

You have taken a pov. vow ya bum, ur mount hasn't.. horsey earings if must but 2 rings of counter spells go a long way.

Re-allocate wealth. Deck out your mount.



Or/And give a party member a Pearl of Power for d.anchor. Reallocate Wealth thru others to you.

Not allowed, unless bypassing the intent of the vow in the first place.

Book of Exalted Deeds pg 30

Having a character in the party who has taken a vow of poverty should not necessarily mean that the other party members get bigger shares of treasure! An ascetic character must be as extreme in works of charity as she is in self-denial. The majority of her share of party treasure (or the profits from the sale thereof) should be donated to the needy, either directly (equipping rescued captives with gear taken from their fallen captors) or indirectly (making a large donation to a temple noted for its work among the poor).

An ascetic has no starting wealth by definition and still gets his proper share of treasure but must give it away (and not to other party members).

A mount, like a familiar does not get a share of party treaure.

Now if it was a cohort instead that would be a different matter - but then the cohort is entitled to a cohort's share not an increased share of any treasure. The amount a cohort (or other significant NPC) gets of party treasure is always subject to negotiations among the party but should in general be set ahead of time,