Lord Pendragon
First Post
This is my reading as well. Not that Caliban needs validation.Caliban said:I meant that each arrow is a seperate instance of damage every round, so the resistance applies to the damage from each arrow every round.
This is my reading as well. Not that Caliban needs validation.Caliban said:I meant that each arrow is a seperate instance of damage every round, so the resistance applies to the damage from each arrow every round.
Caliban said:I'm not sure what you think I meant, but that's not it.
I meant that each arrow is a seperate instance of damage every round, so the resistance applies to the damage from each arrow every round.
No, the extra 2d4 isn't an attack, but it isn't the same source of damage as the round before it.RigaMortus said:But as someone quoted above, it says in the DMG that DR applies to "each attack". Are you suggesting that the extra 2d4 damage is considered an "attack"? Or are you siding with the MM?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.