• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Do Sorcerers need components?


log in or register to remove this ad



It is true that they do need components by the rules, but I have modified them in my campaign to get the Eschew Materials feat at first level, applicable only to sorcerer spells. I thought it a neat flavor enhancement, especially since I don't really see sorcerers instinctively knowing that they should swallow a live spider in order to climb up that wall over there.

Note that this is a metamagic feat, so it does increase their casting time. Thus, they can do without, but components make it easier.

-Tiberius
 
Last edited:

Sorcerers and wizards cast exactly the same way, using all the same components (verbal, somatic, and material). The PHB states that if you watched a wizard and a sorcerer casting the same spell, you would not be able to tell them apart in any way.

The feat that Crothain mentioned is Eschew Materials, a metamagic feat that allows any caster to ignore cheap material components. It works just like Still Spell and Silent Spell, which let you remove somatic and verbal components respectively.
 




Hammerhead said:
No, the Alternate Sorcerer only spends XP on spells with expensive material components; not every spell.
You'll have to re-read it man... 1/25 gp cost in EXP... min of 1 for each spell.
 

Sitting here with BOEM2 in my lap turned to page 10.

Hammerhead and mikebr99
are both right.

In the total context of the paragraph though, I agree with Hammerhead.

Went to Monte's boards and did not find anything about this, didn't post because Monte's at GENCON.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top