Do Tariffs Apply To RPG Books? Maybe, Maybe Not!

us-customs-apis-pt1.jpg


When the recent tariffs were announced by the US, panic was the first reaction from tabletop roleplaying game publishers.

This was soon followed by a wave of hope as people shared an official exemption list which included "printed books, brochures, leaflets and similar printed matter in single sheets, whether or not folded" and "printed books, brochures, leaflets and similar printed matter, other than in single sheets" (see codes 49011000 and 49019900). Seemingly, TTRPG rulebooks might escape the tariffs!

Screenshot 2025-04-14 at 2.10.01 PM.png

However, ICv2 is reporting that this may not be the case. According to a pair of rulings dating all the way back to 1989 and 1991, TTRPG rulebooks are instead classified as "arcade, table or parlor games… parts and accessories thereof". These rulings came from the US Custom and Border Protection agency, and were applied to Columbia Games and West End Games, respectively.

The first ruling was titled "Fantasy Role Play Expansion Modules".

In our opinion, heading 9504 provides the more specific description of the merchandise in issue. The modules enhance fantasy game play; they were not designed for passive reading.

- US Customs and Border Protection, November 1989​

The second ruling, titled "Fantasy role play games books are expansion modules are designed to enhance fantasy game play, not for passive reading" reads as follows.

As a result of the foregoing, the instant merchandise is classified under subheading 9504.90.9080, HTSUSA, as articles for arcade, table or parlor games, including pinball machines, bagatelle, billiards and special tables for casino games; automatic bowling alley equipment; parts and accessories thereof; other, other, other, other. The applicable rate of duty is 4.64 percent ad valorem.

- US Customs and Border Protection, November 1991​

These rulings are both 35 years old, so there is no guarantee that the same ruling would be made today. This ruling, from last year, classifies a Shadowrun supplement as a book, noting that "This ruling only takes into consideration the books when imported separately." But it does cast doubt on the status of TTRPG rulebooks. Are they books or are they games, according to the US customs agencies? If the latter, TTRPG books coming from China would suffer the same 145% tariff that boxed sets, accessories, and boardgames do. That means that a $30K print run of a few thousand books would incur an additional $43,500 bill when arriving at port in the US--considerably more than it costs to manufacture them in the first place.

Products coming from countries other than China are currently subject to a lower 10% tariff. However, with the speed at which the situation changes, it is impossible for companies to plan shipments to the US. Whatever the tariffs, what is necessary for trade is stability. Most organisations need a lead time measured in weeks--or sometimes months--in order to budget and plan for manufacturing and international shipments, and the tariffs are currently changing on a daily basis. And without even knowing for sure whether TTRPG rulebooks incur the tariff, we may have to wait until the first shipment hits port to find out!

 

log in or register to remove this ad

These certainly are trying times for many fairly small businesses, but the problem did not begin with the recent change in Presidents in the USA. He certainly kicked the anthill but the ants were already raiding each other and burrowing around against each other for quite a long time.

Mod Note:
This thread is NOT going to be about the overall politics of tariffs. If you don't want to keep it to how tariffs are impacting the game industry, take it to some other venue, please and thanks.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I have a probably stupid question. Will these tariffs directly affect the price of PDFs? Indirectly, sure, in various ways. But are purely digital publications about to get hosed?
 



I have a probably stupid question. Will these tariffs directly affect the price of PDFs? Indirectly, sure, in various ways. But are purely digital publications about to get hosed?
I have a sneaking suspicion they might go up in price to help make up for the loss of sales of physical books, unless a company chooses to ditch physical books altogether. I don't know if that counts as indirectly, though.
 


I have a sneaking suspicion they might go up in price to help make up for the loss of sales of physical books, unless a company chooses to ditch physical books altogether. I don't know if that counts as indirectly, though.
In my neck of publishing, we usually target a PDF at 80% of a print product for new content.
 

I have a sneaking suspicion they might go up in price to help make up for the loss of sales of physical books, unless a company chooses to ditch physical books altogether. I don't know if that counts as indirectly, though.
This sounds likely. The margin on books has always been higher than PDFs (probably because I price my PDFs between $5-$10), so to make up the difference I might increase that. For those companies that charge $20-$30 for a pdf? Who knows. I can only speak for myself, but it doesn't feel right to me to charge $30 for a pdf. That seems really high.
 

This sounds likely. The margin on books has always been higher than PDFs (probably because I price my PDFs between $5-$10), so to make up the difference I might increase that. For those companies that charge $20-$30 for a pdf? Who knows. I can only speak for myself, but it doesn't feel right to me to charge $30 for a pdf. That seems really high.
The print run is usually one of the smallest costs involved in producing a product. The art, the writing, the editing, the layout…. all that is what costs the money. The $3 per unit (or whatever) on the print run is just a tiny fraction of the total cost. Seems weird to assign the largest part of the price to the smallest part of the development costs.
 

The print run is usually one of the smallest costs involved in producing a product. The art, the writing, the editing, the layout…. all that is what costs the money. The $3 per unit (or whatever) on the print run is just a tiny fraction of the total cost. Seems weird to assign the largest part of the price to the smallest part of the development costs.
I guess that depends on your print run. And to view it from a customer's perspective. They typically don't care about how the sausage is made, so-to-speak, they only look at the product. And as a customer, I'd have a hard time paying nearly as much for a digital copy as I do a print physical product. Then again, maybe I'm archaic and out of touch with modern customers. That's a real possibility. 🤷‍♂️
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top