Do you consider PDF cost by Page Count?

Sigurd

First Post
I have to hand it to WOTC for having consistently good cost per page for their products. Preference aside, they give you reading value and something to think about.

The Monster Manual III came in at 15 cents a page. Most of the first run independent PDF's I sampled couldn't match it. This is especially true if you consider that almost all pdf's lose 3 pages from their count to Title page, License Page, and Back page*. 3 padded pages from a 7 page pdf is a disproportionate hit.

* I realize that many people consider cover art important. I do sometimes, so take the 'paded page category' as you will.

Interestingly the Burning Sky came out very cheaply on the page count to a price of 06 cents per page. Although there is a fair amount of reprinting among their pages - I still think this is an excellent deal.

Books that had shelf time as printed works tend to be cheaper by the page (IMHO). I think thats because the physical demands of producing something that wont bend and buckle and that will bear comparison to other larger works.

The AEG works tend to have good value but many could be updated to 3.5.


Although it is not the only point of comparison I think cost per page is a very valid one. I appreciate publishers who give you the page count of a pdf. It keeps me coming back to RPGNow as they have page counts for every product. At Your Games Now it is apparently not required universally but many publishers include it with their product descriptions.





Do you consider price per page when you buy PDF's?
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Only when it is extreme. But then I feel the same way about print books. I am much more interested in quality then quantity.
 

Perhaps you should break the cost down in PDF size(byte) versus cost. As that is a more telling and stable way to figure the cost in. A 100 page PDF of "The Best Art of D&D for 2007" would take a heck of a lot more space than a 100 page PDF of "The Best Feats of D&D for 2007".

Yeti
 

I agree with both of you. Its not the only point of comparison but I think it is a constant one.

Bytes per $ is also a point of comparison. Its less valid for my personal use because I like story and and rules material primarily. Bytes can be anything and big pictures are not necessarily good pictures. If there are more pages I assume there are more ideas - I know this is an assumption but its often right.

To use your example - A 100pg book of art would likely have more images than a 30 page book. Given similar byte size for the file I'd take the 100 page one. More pictures over larger pictures. My screen and printer might not benefit from the higher bandwidth artwork anyway.

Certainly if I'm comparing works by two publishers I respect I think its good to know which is the larger work.

S
 
Last edited:



It is more an added cost, in case want to print it out.

One consideraion, I do expect a print version of the pdf if the page count is high.
 

I don't judge pdf's by price per page count, but it's one of the criteria I consider. Note that even the "page count" is deceptive, as some pdf's have such a loose layout that they contain a very low word count per page.

But sure, I compare pdf price points to print price points when I make buying decisions.
 

Morrus said:
Word count would be better. If I use a big enough font, I could make a PDF 10,000 pages long! :D

Point well taken.
So somewhere one of us geeks will come up with a formula for this.
Word Count + Byte Size + Value of Content = True Retail Price
 

Sigurd said:
I agree with both of you. Its not the only point of comparison but I think it is a constant one.

Bytes per $ is also a point of comparison. Its less valid for my personal use because I like story and and rules material primarily. Bytes can be anything and big pictures are not necessarily good pictures. If there are more pages I assume there are more ideas - I know this is an assumption but its often right.

To use your example - A 100pg book of art would likely have more images than a 30 page book. Given similar byte size for the file I'd take the 100 page one. More pictures over larger pictures. My screen and printer might not benefit from the higher bandwidth artwork anyway.

Nah, that'd be a silly way to do it, I think. Depends on the resolution, whether it's colour or b/w, compression, and a billion other things.

I have various versions of the War of the Burning Sky adventures on my hard drive. They're all the same content; the same adventures. But different versions of the same adventure can be ten times the size of other versions, and various sizes in between.

If people judgd by page count, publishers could just use a big font. If they judged by file size, then they could make every PDF a gigabyte in size.
 

Remove ads

Top