The 3.5 version of Haste states that:
"When making a full attack action, a hasted creature may make one extra attack with any weapon he is holding. "
A buddy of mine thinks that since a monk doesn't really "hold" his unarmed attack, he is therefore not affected by Haste.
I realize that monk's hands are considered light weapons, and I believe my buddy is parsing the wording of the spell way too closely. I was wondering how you would counter his argument.
I believe that since a monk's unarmed attack is considered a light weapon, his unarmed attacks are indeed affected by 3.5 Haste. Am I wrong?
Thanks.
edit: One more thing: if a monk's unarmed attack isn't affected by 3.5 Haste, does this mean that neither are a Troll's claw attacks? Or any monsters natural weapons?
"When making a full attack action, a hasted creature may make one extra attack with any weapon he is holding. "
A buddy of mine thinks that since a monk doesn't really "hold" his unarmed attack, he is therefore not affected by Haste.
I realize that monk's hands are considered light weapons, and I believe my buddy is parsing the wording of the spell way too closely. I was wondering how you would counter his argument.
I believe that since a monk's unarmed attack is considered a light weapon, his unarmed attacks are indeed affected by 3.5 Haste. Am I wrong?
Thanks.
edit: One more thing: if a monk's unarmed attack isn't affected by 3.5 Haste, does this mean that neither are a Troll's claw attacks? Or any monsters natural weapons?
Last edited: