melkorspawn
First Post
Hypersmurf said:Now why didn't I think of that?
-Hyp.
Probably because I'm an idiot savant.
Hypersmurf said:Now why didn't I think of that?
-Hyp.
Saeviomagy said:It just shows how stupid it is for PrCs and feats to rely on skill ranks
Except that then you could have things like a rogue that's maxed out diplomacy and never put a rank into hide qualifying for Shadow Dancer. The minimum skill ranks requirement ensures that a person getting into that class has trained for it.Mistwell said:I wish they would just list "Minimum character level X" for Prestige Classes sometimes.
Krelios said:Except that then you could have things like a rogue that's maxed out diplomacy and never put a rank into hide qualifying for Shadow Dancer. The minimum skill ranks requirement ensures that a person getting into that class has trained for it.
I wouldn't be opposed to using "minimum total skill modifier" instead of "minimum number of ranks" but that's a different argument.
Saeviomagy said:It just shows how stupid it is for PrCs and feats to rely on skill ranks, when really that's a meaningless measure if you're looking for "how good someone is at something".
Mistwell said:Well what I would like is "Skill Modifier X" plus a min Character Level. So Min Character Level 8 and Hide 10 (not ranks, total) should work in my opinion. There is nothing special about ranks aside from as a prerequisite. A rank in a non-trained-only skill is exactly like a bonus to that same skill in all ways except for qualifying for other things. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, and leads to more one-dimensional characters.