Does this sig make me look fat?

[Macbeth]

no problem with your sig, and I really like only having sigs display once. Cleans up so much clutter, and they're still there if I want to see them. Nice little hack, Spoony.

 

[Nifft]

I'm not a huge fan of font size changes in sigs, but the volume of content is just fine.

-- N

 

[Dimwhit]

My personal favorite answer is, "No, your sig doesn't make you look fat--your fat makes you look fat." But that would be rude, so I'd never say that. And mean it.

I got a Tommy Boy flash when I saw the title.

Tommy: Richard, does this suit make me look fat?
Richard: No. Your face does.

For the record i cant stand that.

No offense, BK, but it's honestly sigs like yours that make me very grateful for that change. Not that there's anything wrong with your sig, but when I scroll down a thread and see more than half the text on the page taken up with sigs...well, it gets a little old. I think barsoomcore's sig is just fine too. But not 10 times on one page.

 

[ASH]

I have to agree with the last poster. I really like the concept of 1 sig per page. It seems to make the page less difficult to read.

Oh, and your sig looks fine!

 

[doghead]

The links wrap around on my screen, making it look a little confused (832 X 624). As does the mix of caps and lower case. But you've avoided the color spray approach which is appreciated.

I read somewhere that sig shouldn't take up more space than the body of the post. Words to live by I thought, but not everyone agrees. So I would have to say the new one sig per page works for me in that regard.

 

[Cthulhu's Librarian]

For the record i cant stand that.

I've got to agree with the others above, BK, that your sig is one of the ones that makes me glad for this. Too much text and too much color. You really might want to consider toning one or the other down, if not both.

 

[Michael Morris]

For the record i cant stand that.

Sorry,

 

[BSF]

I'm not a huge fan of font size changes in sigs, but the volume of content is just fine.

-- N

Nifft, I have been operating under the thought that making my .sig smaller text makes it less obnoxious, though it might be a little harder to read. Is there a problem with my .sig in general?

 

[Brother Shatterstone]

I'm not a huge fan of font size changes in sigs, but the volume of content is just fine.

What about the font size in my signature?

barsoomcore, your sig looks good to me also... (I worry about the same thing also and my signature is like 2 lines...)

 

[Altamont Ravenard]

If you need a negative comment, I think the bold makes it a little too flashy. But other than that, I don't mind the sig.

AR