Dragon #316: Se*ual Innuendo on p.28

[Emirikol]

So...what are the chances that the innuendo on p.28 is deliberate?

jh

 

[Harlock]

Care to enlighten those of us that live in postally challenged areas and haven't received our magazine yet?

 

[Harlock]

*bump*, any takers?

 

[Perun]

*bump*, any takers?

I don't have the magazine, but it's probably regarding how Innuendo got folded into Bluff skill in 3.5, and does not exist any more. So, I guess the original poster is wondering whether the author of the article used Innuendo on purpose, or is it merely a mistake.

 

[Emirikol]

No. This is about the actual sexual/porno innuendo on that page. Not the skill

jh

 

[Emirikol]

dup.

 

[MrFilthyIke]

What does it say? You're killing me with curiosity now.

 

[Emirikol]

What does it say? You're killing me with curiosity now.

Nope. You've got to see it for yourself to believe it. I'm still wondering if it's deliberate. It must be. You don't go and put something like that on there and then expect no response...

jh

 

[robaustin]

I'll go ahead and spoil it....(space for those who want to see for themselves...)
























There's a picture of a woman - and the plaque below her says "swallow."

Ugh....

 

[Alzrius]

Oi, I didn't even notice that double entendre until it was mentioned here. Personally, I don't think that was deliberate. The idea is that that type of spy operative is named for birds, men are Ravens (I think) and women are Swallows. So it makes sense that a picture of a woman who is that kind of spy would have the subtitle "Swallow". The others all have their own subtitles also.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.