Imhotepthewise
Explorer
Pg. 58 War Magic Article. Is there a typo in Energy Substitution feat? No sonic? Sonic is energy per the PHB. Usta be in that feat from Tome and Blood.
Imhotepthewise said:Pg. 58 War Magic Article. Is there a typo in Energy Substitution feat? No sonic? Sonic is energy per the PHB. Usta be in that feat from Tome and Blood.
Hammerhead said:Which was why Energy Substitution was useful, it allowed an evoker to bypass monster elemental resistance. I never saw it as a problem, just a useful feat. I know that none of my arcanists would ever take a non-Sonic Energy Substition...what would be the point? It's like saying that Weapon Specialization is a problem because it allows you to do more damage.
What you just said proves that it was a problem...if something is so good that no-one ever wants to take anything else (or another form of the same thing), then it's probably too good.Hammerhead said:Which was why Energy Substitution was useful, it allowed an evoker to bypass monster elemental resistance. I never saw it as a problem, just a useful feat. I know that none of my arcanists would ever take a non-Sonic Energy Substition...what would be the point? It's like saying that Weapon Specialization is a problem because it allows you to do more damage.
Kirin'Tor said:What you just said proves that it was a problem...if something is so good that no-one ever wants to take anything else (or another form of the same thing), then it's probably too good.
It can't be compared to WS or WF, or even GWF \ GWS...if _every_ fighter took WS, then it could be assumed it was out of balance...as it stands, many fighters take WS, but some take the Power Attack or Dodge Tree first...

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.