Phaezen
Adventurer
Points 1 and 6 as redundant I'll give you, although I possibly worded point 6 badly. I intended that it is obviously a patchwork of dragon remains.Here are my problems – and my issue is not that the content is "wrong" somehow, but that it's insubstantial:
- items one and six are redundant
- items three and four are traits common to most all undead; if you're taking an approach that relies on the DM bringing outside knowledge or preconceptions, then what you bring to the descriptions you provide had better qualify those preconceptions
- item five makes the existence of the phylactery pretty pointless
- leaving item two which tells you a little, I guess; and knowing it's made from several dragons tells you a bit.
Point 3, is very debateable, but most likely a common trait of most unwilling intellegent undead. It does reinforce point 2 that the soul driving this dracolich is an unwilling participant.
Point 4, I would actually say is uncommon amongst the intellegent undead. Specifically for Dracolichs, as the 4e Monster Manual specifically points out that most dracolichs will attempt to flee if they are overpowered. To the point of saving an action point to help them get away.
Point 5, As I have pointed out a dracolich's phylactery is only similar to a lich's phylactery in that it houses the soul of the creature. A dracolich's phylatery is used by the cult that created a dracolich to control said dracolich. Most willing dracolichs do not have phylacteries and those unwilling ones who get the chance destroy the phylactery to gain thier freedom. Houseing the phylactery in the Mongrels own body helps prevent the dracolich destroying the phylactery as it is bound by its ritual not to harm itself.
Like I said I have read much longer monster descriptions that were just as empty so I don't think the solution is "more fluff" – it's just that the sum total of this monster is "undead dragon grunt" and I suspect you could get as much out of the monster entry if the descriptive text were excised and all you had to go on was the statblock and the picture.
Very little of the stablock actualy gives the impression of the unwilling nature of the Mongrel, just undead dragon grunt. The fluff actualy gives quite a nice background to the stats. It is possible that I have read alot into the fluff due to the fact that this is something I was looking for in my campaign and with a little amout of effort will fit nicely.
Munkeywrench has written up a nice story but it works the same with any other powerful-but-not-uber undead slotted in for the dracolich mongrel.
True, but what necromancer does not want a dracolich under his control?
Phaezen