When I was in my board game burying craze I kept hearing about this game - like it was some shining jewel of a game from days gone by . Then it got republished years after its original release, so I bought a copy. Wow, was I ever unimpressed. To each their own, but it's mediocre IMO and I traded my copy away rather quickly.
It's very simple, but that's part of its charm. It's not a deep strategy game. It's casual, and you can play it while still maintaining a conversation, and/or play with kids. And it successfully conveys the feel and theme. It's literally the first dungeon crawling board game, from which all others quasi-descend. But yeah, if you want strategic depth, it's going to be unsatisfying.
As GreyLord points out, the strategy is mostly gambling- how deep to go? How big a risk to run to find bigger treasures (which are on lower levels; but so are more dangerous monsters)> And somewhat in character selection. The stronger characters really need to go deep because they need so much gold to win, where the weaker ones can do it with mostly low level rooms and maybe a quick delve deeper.
In the late 90s I went into a phase where I would paint miniatures as a hobby and I got a box of characters for Dungeon! that I think was used but unpainted (it has a 1989 copyright and I got that way later)... They came with little cards for new spell cards, but I don't think I had the rules. They were TSR and Ral Partha branded. There were 10 characters and supposedly 4 new ones? It also includes cards for the Illusionary
Ah! Found 'em! The characters were: The Cleric, the Halfing (not halfLing), the Ranger, the Warrior, the Paladin, the Elf, the Dwarf, the Wizard, the Thief and the Gnome Illusionist. The spells were Illusionary Warrior and Telekinesis Treasure. No explanation what they do
Yeah, my brother and I had The New Dungeon! and the expansion set of minis & characters. As I recall the Ranger, Gnome Illusionist, Paladin, and Halfling were the expansion characters.
I can't remember what TK treasure did (maybe give you a chance to steal a monster's or another player's treasure without fighting them?), but I'm pretty sure Illusionary Warrior let you fight a monster using the Warrior's value/target number. Might have also allowed you to avoid injury if you lost, since the monster wasn't actually beating you up, but the illusion.
I don't think I've played it since the Bush administration, the first Bush administration, and I'm almost positive I must have played the 1989 version rather than the '75 version. But I couldn't tell you anything about how the game plays other than you go through a dungeon and kill things. I didn't even remember you had to collect treasure to win until I looked it up.
In truth, there are a lot of games I loved way back then that I have fond memories about, but I doubt I'd want to play them these days. Starfleet Battles and Car Wars are two that I can think of off the top of my head. Good times, but tedious these days.
Yeah, a lot of those older games play really slow. SFB was notorious for it back then, too. Car Wars I have a lot of nostalgia for, and even still own my old stuff, but I think newer, simpler games do the concept better nowadays. Battletech is another genuine classic that takes quite a while if you're not in practice and don't have the tables and modifiers memorized.
Definitely in contrast to those kinds of games, Dungeon! is casual and quick, and has the virtues of being the original dungeon crawler, and clearly representing monsters, characters, and mechanics (in simplified form) from D&D itself, as opposed to something kind of similar, like most such games.
My small town local library had this and we played it for a while as kids. Other than the cool box art it didn't really manage to capture out attentions for long. Especially when we had stuff like D&D, AD&D and HeroQuest.
I seem to vaguely recall the paladin being capable of healing another hero as a special thing he could do, but there was no reason to as you were playing against the other heroes.
Both the Paladin and Cleric could heal themselves or others. They did note that healing other people wasn't normally worthwhile, but there was some expectation that folks might want to make house rules or create cooperative variants. Maybe if you had four players, for example, you could play a two on two team game instead of a free for all.