Ebook RPG Books

Provided it does not cost a fortune, I'll probably buy one.

That's the one question Plastic Logic hasn't answered yet, and it could be a deal breaker for me too. B-)

As for WotC, that's a good question. The industry and eBook reader technology popularity might "force" them back into the PDF business.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

E-readers still have a way to go for pdfs. If you try to resize pdfs on the sony e-reader it either doesn't size it or scambles the page. On the Kindle dx you can't resize pdfs at all. But on the kindle Dx (this is the big kindle for those who don't know) pdfs are readable. I can read the players handbook 4th ed (bought before the GREAT PULL), Pathfinder core book, and magazines such as LevelUp and Kobald quarterly. Two column pdfs are better than 3 columns for ease of reading.
Even though both units have a headings for table of contents. This doesn't work in pdfs. Where books formatted for the e-reader it does.
I even have character sheets on the kindle dx.
 

I am not a fan of the idea of sizing game books down for small screens. Game books are the largish size they are for a reason, the same reason most textbooks come with large pages - large pages are good for reference use.

Right now, e-book readers are relatively expensive beasts, and the books for them not typically cheaper than paperback equivalents. So, unless you have a storage space problem, e-books are probably not an economic win. Until the price points change, that will be a barrier to real mass-use of the things.
 

It depends on the file and the reader. The DX reads most PDFs really well, but those with artistic borders and background images can be less of a pleasure to read.

The Astak Pocket Pro has a 5" screen and reads PDFs that are reflowable fairly well. Images can choke it, and borders can be displayed as their own image, which is annoying. The biggest problem is that charts either get messed up by the reflow or, if originally saved as an image, are pretty unreadable as there is no way to zoom in on it.

So, 469 for the DX... 199 for the Pocket Pro... 150 or less for other readers that read PDFs with reflow when they are on sale.

If all u want is to read the rules and not worry about the charts, you can read PDFs relatively cheap. Just lower your expectations ;)
 

I can't recommend tablets, especially, the ThinkPad, enough. If it were only about 1/3 of the weight, it would be perfect! B-)

I love my T61p Thinkpad, so yeah, my next laptop will also be a Thinkpad. I don't mind the weight (and I have the extra large battery), and I travel with my laptop daily to and from work. What I want next gen is a tablet, with multi-touch, handwriting recognition, stylus, and the ability to rotate the screen portrait or landscape depending on my task.

That would give me the ability to not only use it for reference material (should WoTC ever decide to sell their stuff online), but I could also use things like Maptool and Excel at the same time. Those dinky readers aren't going to cut it compared to that sort of functionality.
 

As for charts on the Kindle Dx, they are just fine. I have no problem reading them. Character sheets are just great on the unit.
No problem with portrait pics either. I also remember reading that a color e-reader is coming out. I beleive it is from Fujitsu. But the price is very steep.
I know Asus is also working on a color e-reader. Barnes and Noble will be selling one called the Nook after the holidays. I think they are taking preorders.
 


I love my T61p Thinkpad, so yeah, my next laptop will also be a Thinkpad. I don't mind the weight (and I have the extra large battery), and I travel with my laptop daily to and from work. What I want next gen is a tablet, with multi-touch, handwriting recognition, stylus, and the ability to rotate the screen portrait or landscape depending on my task.

That would give me the ability to not only use it for reference material (should WoTC ever decide to sell their stuff online), but I could also use things like Maptool and Excel at the same time. Those dinky readers aren't going to cut it compared to that sort of functionality.

That is true. but e-reader are not ment to be computers.
What is your battery life between charges?
 

FWIW, I'm not completely sold on e-readers, but I may be getting one for my Mom this year or next (just because they can magnify text).

If/when there are decent numbers of RPG titles I want- as well as sheet music- I'll get one for me as well.

But I'll still be buying the paper versions preferentially. The e-versions would be for portability & backup, not for use at the table.

Besides... Paper is an industry that needs to die. Even the recycling of it is environmentally toxic. It wastes epic amounts of water and dumps toxins into the watershed and groundwater at a prodigious rate. Water cycle is a bit of a mess as it is, and paper is making a lot of otherwise great fresh water unusable.

While its true that the paper industry is pretty toxic- usually ranked as the #2 polluter in Texas, right behind the Big Oil/petrochemical industries- there remains one thing that paper does extremely well that electronics may never match: Endure.

We have texts that last hundreds and even thousands of years, and while modern paper isn't as durable, its still going to last many decades. As long as some human can read the language, its accessible. As long as there is light, they can be read, even in the absence of electrical power.

Electronic documents have inherent durability issues:

1) They depend on a power source to read. Energy, as yet, is not generally clean- remember what I said about Big Oil? And even when energy is stored in battery form, there are issues, such as how to dispose of expired batteries. Even "green" energy methods depend on (you got it) plastics from the petrochemical industry, as well as mined and refined metals. Ever see a copper, gold, or platinum mine? Not exactly eco-friendly. Just like paper & Big Oil, the ore mining/refining industries also dump huge amounts of toxins into the environment, as well as contribute to soil erosion and other hazards.

And besides...120v or 220v?

2) They depend on software to convert bits into forms readable to humans, meaning that if software changes, data may be lost. They also depend on specific hardware, which, again, may cause data to be lost when formats change.

Example: as yet, I still have reel-to-reels, cassettes, and LPs that never got converted into CD form...and if/when non-physical music platforms like MP3s (and beyond) become the dominant form (if they aren't already), more recorded music will be lost. Ditto my VCR tapes vis a vis DVDs. Some of that stuff is simply not commercially available.

(For the record, I still have a few VHS, cassette & turntable devices, but had to get rid of my reel-to-reel.)

3) They are supported by hardware that is largely made of plastics and other high-tech materials (including the aforementioned refined metals)...IOW, arguably more toxic and hazardous than paper.

Which format, as a whole, is more toxic? I honestly don't know.

I just know its not a black & white issue.;)
 
Last edited:

I just know its not a black & white issue.;)
Actually, this one is. The recycling tech for most of those metals is cleaner than paper and the volume is far less. This is actually a case of new tech being less polluting than old tech. That's actually very common, but we'd like to pretend that pollution is a new problem.

Paper and textiles still destroy a lot of watersheds, especially in developing countries that are already having water problems. The sheer volume of the industry puts it head and shoulders above most others in terms of impact, but paper seems so benign, so it gets little press. It's way easier to scare people with tech, because it's new and complex, but heavy metal in your local water is more likely to come from paper mills than anything in the "tech" sector.
 

Remove ads

Top