Elephant's Hide overpowered?


log in or register to remove this ad



You could instead become a polar bear, which has a natural armour bonus of +5, as well as a natural attack scheme, and stay that way for several hours. Or a dire boar, which has a bonus of +6, and natural attacks. Certainly there are advantages to being a humanoid, such as being able to hold objects and use certain items, but most druids I've seen have Natural Spell and spend most of their time wild-shaped anyway. I don't see it as too overpowered, especially since they don't gain a natural attack at 1d8+12 damage if they use up a wild shape to accomplish it, and they need to use a feat to do it.
 


Nope, no problems from me. Does it have anything of thematic affect (does the skin actually go grey and thick). Are there other spells of similiar effect.
 




Crothian said:
natural armor bonuses do not stack, so you are correct Sir!

Well...most of the time. Except for the barkskin spell which also grants a natural armor bonus.

SRD said:
Barkskin toughens a creature’s skin. The effect grants a +2 enhancement bonus to the creature’s existing natural armor bonus. This enhancement bonus increases by 1 for every three caster levels above 3rd, to a maximum of +5 at caster level 12th.

The enhancement bonus provided by barkskin stacks with the target’s natural armor bonus, but not with other enhancement bonuses to natural armor. A creature without natural armor has an effective natural armor bonus of +0.
 

Remove ads

Top