I think elves are weak. A lot of the benefits, like "search for secret doors" are just silly. Players forget that one all the time. The dwarven bonuses are easier to remember; they come up more often. (The good ones; I don't care about +1 to hit vs goblinoids, but +2 save vs magic or poison is really cool and players almost never forget about it).
Land Outcast said:
Actually, Elves perform GREAT at being Rangers... (the best ranger is the Archer ranger who moves in, shoots, and moves back away); Rangers never made very good front line fighters... too little hp anyways
No they don't, at least not at low levels. You can't get Precise Shot at 1st-level as an elf. Unless you like taking -4 to hit all the time... Other than that, they're pretty decent actually. My last ranger PC was a human though. I made the mistake of not taking Precise Shot at first level, and felt pain for two levels as a result. That's not a mistake I want to make again.
For that matter, elven swordsmen, while they're cool, are mechanically weak. DnD shafts light fighters again and again and again. The Swashbuckler classes ... all the ones I've seen are weak. Even in BoNS, the light fighter (what do you call it?) is much weaker than the warblade, even if you completely ignore the maneuvers.
Shade said:
There are numerous spells to prevent you from getting hit, gain temporary hit points, become immune to near-everything.
The Con bonus becomes less important at higher levels, but you've got to live that long. Also, sometimes high hit points are nice at higher levels anyway. There's always a way past a wizard's defenses, even if it's just blind luck on the part of the opponents.