WanderingMonster
First Post
Mark said:
I think I spent close to 200 hours the first year reading, comparing artwork, going back and rereading after finding that my good piles contained more than just five potential nominees. Then there's checking, and rechecking the fan sites, publisher websites (part of the best publisher requisites), discussing through the message boards with the other committee members and going back to take a closer look at some things because of their input. And that was the first year when there were fewer entrants than last, and, dare I say, far fewer still than there are likely to be this year. It's a substantial commitment, to say the least. Good luck!![]()
I just withdrew my name from consideration. 200+ hours...dang. I work that and then some for my full time job every month! No, I couldn't give this task the consideration it deserves.
Here's a thought...category judging? Maybe as the Ennies grow, it might be useful to have judges only actually judge a few categories. This would allow the individual categories to get more careful consideration (and I'm not implying that they haven't in the past). It would also allow for more participation. The Ennies are unique because the fans recognize quality in the d20 game industry. More fans=more representative.
These suggestions are all well meaning. I respect the Ennies and believe the judges perform a heckuva job each year. I'm just feeling left out because, well...200+ hours. Egads! Between work, family, and--of course--gaming, that's nigh impossible!
I realize this is my unsolicited opinion, but hey, I can opine, can't I?
