Epic D&D campaign (still recruiting)

[Shayuri]

It doesn't? Hm! Well, no biggy. Like I said, Invisibility is just one of Omega's defenses. Handy, but not by itself essential.

Thanks for the warning though.

 

[rangerjohn]

Thanks you two, somehow I missed the phrase 'one level higher than you can already cast.

 

[Vertexx69]

It doesn't? Hm! Well, no biggy. Like I said, Invisibility is just one of Omega's defenses. Handy, but not by itself essential.

Thanks for the warning though.

Ditto hence situational bonus, and sequester should work against see invisibility and true seeing for a couple of reasons:

1. It isn't an illusion its an abjuration. (In other words, you don't just think I'm invisible, I'm actually wrapped in a protective shell of invisibility.)

2. It specifically says it works against divinations that detect or locate the subject, and it says you become invisible to ALL forms of sight and seeing (except through items).

3. Its a higher lvl spell than either of those divination spells that detect and/or locate the subject, and an epic lvl item vs non epic lvl spells.

So I'll take a DM ruling on this one, and call it done without any more debate thx

 

[rangerjohn]

Question on the bite of line of spells. Can you wear armor in that form and can you use manufactured weapons?

 

[Jemal]

So I'll take a DM ruling on this one, and call it done without any more kibitzing thx

A: Very well, we'll leave it to the DM. If he rules that it works that way, then that's his call, it's his campaign, and I'll be joining you in the 'permanently undetectable by any means other than + 100 spot or Items' club.

B: I'm going to assume that you don't actually know what kibitzing means, b/c if you do then you're being rude.. not to mention misusing the word. Kibitzing is when a meddlesome person offers unwanted advice.
If you consider me meddlesome, that's your perogative, though there are more polite ways to ask someone to stop doing so. Secondly, I wasnt offering you advice, I was stating my opinions on a rule. and I'll thank you to not try and prevent me from offering my own opinions.

 

[Jemal]

Rangerjohn - the Bite of X Spells don't actually change you that much. They make you a bit bulkier, give you hands claws, and alter your face. They don't mention anywhere in any of them that they give any penalties to the way you normally function (Most transmutations that alter your form make a point of saying things like "equipment that can't be worn melds", "Can't speak", "Can't wield weapons", etc. )

 

[rangerjohn]

That's what I thought, they're basically turning you into a pseudo-were creature.

 

[Nephtys]

I would like to apologize to you Dharuk for the complaining that I have done in this thread. I have been petty, unreasonable, and selfish. My only excuse is that I got carried away by enthusiasm for the game. From now on I will keep a more positive tone.

 

[Dharuhk Svahre]

Ok, first off, my apologies once more guys. It pains me to sya this so soon after last time, but I got really sick for the last while and haven;t been able to summon up much energy to post.

That being said, I have posted a rogues gallery and started the ingame thread. I would like everybody who wants to start us off to start the roleplaying aspect of their characters after they post, even though I haven't had any chance to look over the final version yet. We can work all that out as we go, I would just like to see us get started.

Nephtys: First off, I do apreciate the apology, and would like to issue one to you as well. I know that working with a concept like yours can be very trying, and I do like to promote original character concepts for this game, But I do also have to play Devil's advocate and I hope that my attempts at balancing characters do not suffer you too much stress. On the other hand though, even without the ability to full round every turn, I still believe you have a very sound character that will prove invaluable to the party.

Vertexx: Ture seeing beats sequester. It may not say so directly under either spell, but a robe of eyes duplicates the effects of true seeing and that is specifically mentioned by sequester.

Alright guys, lets see if we can get this moving. I would love to see your characters in action as soon as possible.

Btw, I apologize but I'm still a bit rusty with the posting system and have to research how to put up links. Maybe I'm just tired and can't remember. Either way, I'm sorry to make you search for the rogues gallery and in game thread.

Just so you all know, the name of those threads is DEAD LEGENDS.

 

[Nephtys]

Ok, first off, my apologies once more guys. It pains me to sya this so soon after last time, but I got really sick for the last while and haven;t been able to summon up much energy to post.

...

Nephtys: First off, I do apreciate the apology, and would like to issue one to you as well. I know that working with a concept like yours can be very trying, and I do like to promote original character concepts for this game, But I do also have to play Devil's advocate and I hope that my attempts at balancing characters do not suffer you too much stress. On the other hand though, even without the ability to full round every turn, I still believe you have a very sound character that will prove invaluable to the party.

Thank you.
It's good to see you post again, I hope you're feeling better now. There are still some details I need to finish on the character, but unless we're thrust right into combat I'm pretty much ready to begin the game.
There was some talk about making two separate groups. Is that still the plan? And in that case, who goes where?