• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Epic Feat. Comments?

I agree with Crothian when he said that at least one taking of that feat should be a prerequite.
However, i don't understand why the requisite of heal 25 ranks.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

trimeulose said:

PS also thought that concealment might be a good idea until I realized that they dont stack wiith one another.

The slef concealment stacks with itself, it just doesn't stack with the Improved Invisibility.
 

karyant said:
I agree with Crothian when he said that at least one taking of that feat should be a prerequite.
However, i don't understand why the requisite of heal 25 ranks.

because you have to make sure that the diet you eat is well edible, and you must moniter your intake of "nutrients". Alchemy is so that it can be done, heal is so that it can be done without poisoning yourself, concentration is to make it "come alive", hide is because the character should already be good at hiding and not just a good chemist (in lamens terms, for testing).
 

Crothian said:


The slef concealment stacks with itself, it just doesn't stack with the Improved Invisibility.

Exactly, what good come of taking concealment if you're just going to turn around and take invisibility. It almost makes concealment a useless feat to take as a req. However by itself, you only need to take 5 times and you get total concealment all day long.

Take for instance dodge/mobility/spring attack

Each logically makes sense to take in that order. You must be able to dodge someone in order to move in to their threat ranges more effectively, and you must be able to move into a threat range effectively before you can do it without provoking an attack of opportunity. However, each can still be used with or without the other.

If you wanted to close in on a wizard, and not back away after your moving in, then mobility would still be useful. The feats therefore are logical, but still seperate of one another.

Concealment seems to be more of a different path than my invisibility. While Nat inv is based off of what you eat and how well you can manage your body, concealment seems to be more of how well can you hide yourself in broad daylight.

Just my opinion, its not like I took it out of a book or something.
 

trimeulose said:


Exactly, what good come of taking concealment if you're just going to turn around and take invisibility. It almost makes concealment a useless feat to take as a req.

Well, the concealment from the feat you'd have all the time, your Invisisbility is limited in use.
 

i like the PrC you wrote up looks good and balanced. i also agree that self concealment should be a req, and it was a good point that your invis is limited while the self conc. is always on so i think that the two would go well together. however the coolest thig on this whole page is the quote for The Boondock Saints. rock on it is one of the best movies ever.....
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top