Eric's Rules Review, or Have You Hugged a Mod Today?

[William Ronald]

Thanks to our Moderators and Administrators

Thanks, Eric.

I think that such a reminder is necessary. Some of the threads have degenerated into name calling and have been closed.

Personally, I think it is up to us as individual posters to try to set good standards in our own posts. For myself, I do throw out an occassional reminder that we need to keep the discussions friendly and respectful.

Dinkeldog wrote:
I don't think acknowledging the existence of the product, or talking in broad strokes about what may be inside is a problem. Take the topic of seduction. While obviously going into details on the activities involved is inappropriate, the simple concept of tempting one sexually is a pretty PG thing. I guess the point is, no, I don't think allowing broad discussion on the BoVD and BoEF is hypocritical. Most of the moderation in those threads has been cooling off tempers and trying to head off personal attacks--not telling people to watch their language and avoid crude topics.

Dinkeldog, excellent post. I think there are many subjects that can be discussed here, such as the BoEF or BoVD, where it is unnecessary to go into explicit details.

I like coming to a place where I can expect to be treated with some level of respect. Most people seem to enjoy this as well.

So, in summary, thanks.

 

[Silver Moon]

Airwolf's post above: ditto from me.