Even if you hate Drizzt, Still read this post.


log in or register to remove this ad


Sigh...so did i waste time writing him two Mithral Scimitars? could you vouch that since they give -3 Armour check penalty, that that rids that extra -2 penalty that you get for using medium weapons and for the fact that they are so light?

*plz, Someone agree with me*
i want to be correct, at least politically about something this evening.
 


No, you did not waste your time. You are absolutely free to make a house rule that mithril weapons reduce the penalties for two-weapon fighting. You could even drop the penalties for two-weapon fighting altogether, if you wish.
 

No, you did not waste your time. You are absolutely free to make a house rule that mithril weapons reduce the penalties for two-weapon fighting. You could even drop the penalties for two-weapon fighting altogether, if you wish.

That's an awfully polite way of saying "Here.", I must say :)

-Hyp.
 


The way the FRCS got around this problem was by giving Drizzt a feat called "Twin Sword Fighting," which enabled him to use two medium weapons and still get the most favorable -2/-2 progression.
 


Whoops! Psi is right - I just looked at the stata block for Drizzt again (from the preview they gave of it online) and it looks like even he takes a -4/-4.

Anyway, having said that, I don't think it would be out of line to require a feat to treat a weapon as one catagory less than it is (making a scimitar a light weapon for a medium character, for example).
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top