Come on down to my blog ThroatPunchGames! A new idea everyday!
I've been playing lots of Pathfinder lately and I ran into two things.
1)Invisibility rules tend to vary. One group I'm with says spells suggestion and cause fear don't affect invisibility, but spells like fireball do. Another group says that any offensive spell dispels invisibility. Here is a feat to fix things.
Invisible Spell-metamagic feat-add +1 to the level of a spell. When you cast a spell that does not directly damage a character, you still remain invisible.
2) I've taken quite a bit of history class and learned that most things can be understood by history. Should you be able to use a knowledge(history) check like bardic knowledge with some penalties? What do you think of this feat?
Historical Perspective-Feat-Based on your study of the histories, you see connections that other do not see-You may use a history check as any other knowledge check with a -4 penalty on the check. This functions in a similar fashion to bardic knowledge.
I've been playing lots of Pathfinder lately and I ran into two things.
1)Invisibility rules tend to vary. One group I'm with says spells suggestion and cause fear don't affect invisibility, but spells like fireball do. Another group says that any offensive spell dispels invisibility. Here is a feat to fix things.
Invisible Spell-metamagic feat-add +1 to the level of a spell. When you cast a spell that does not directly damage a character, you still remain invisible.
2) I've taken quite a bit of history class and learned that most things can be understood by history. Should you be able to use a knowledge(history) check like bardic knowledge with some penalties? What do you think of this feat?
Historical Perspective-Feat-Based on your study of the histories, you see connections that other do not see-You may use a history check as any other knowledge check with a -4 penalty on the check. This functions in a similar fashion to bardic knowledge.