Mr. Wilson
Explorer
Yeah it looks a lot like errata disguised as crunch. It might be better to house rule this to do as you said.
Oh, I agree, IMC I'll be houseruling the fix and then banning the feat.
Yeah it looks a lot like errata disguised as crunch. It might be better to house rule this to do as you said.
In other news, melee training (as seen on flickr) will certainly benefit charisma-based paladins specifically and rogues in general. There was a thread recently about how MAD paladins are. This significantly alleviates those concerns for cha-paladins and gives Str-paladins further reason to hope for some love in Divine Power.
We don't know the detail text. unless the bloggers who got the prerelease version want to comment.
Wasn't it going to only count on Encounter and Daily powers?
Its not 4e specific.ok maybe i'm just missing something cause i haven't played much 4e, but i don't see the big deal. It's a plus one to hit. even when it scales it's still only a plus three. Big whoop it's a scaling version of 3e weapon focus.![]()
Its not 4e specific.
Its just that +3 is a very, very big part of the 20 points on a d20's distribution.
ok maybe i'm just missing something cause i haven't played much 4e, but i don't see the big deal. It's a plus one to hit. even when it scales it's still only a plus three. Big whoop it's a scaling version of 3e weapon focus.![]()
It IS more valuable if you are a non-STR based class who likes to go into melee and expects to make basic attacks on a regular basis. Which is very few classes(Paladin, Rogue, Swordmage, Avenger, Bard, some Rangers, and a small number of Warlocks). I'm certain it will be a popular feat as well. However, when you take Melee Training at 1st level, what are you taking at 2nd? The answer for a lot of people is going to be Weapon/Implement Expertise.ok, sorry if i'm comming off dense, but i still don't see why everyone would automatically want/have to take this. Seems like melee training is much more valuable.