Greetings!
Interesting commentary Sigil!
Sigil wrote:
____________________________________________________
Quote:
"Some of the code you have outlined, Shark, could force a paladin to walk a razor's edge..."
____________________________________________________
End Quote.
Indeed, Sigil, that is precisely the idea! Walking the Razor's Edge is the challenge of being a Paladin, in my mind. I like that!
____________________________________________________
Quote:
"<Goblins> are declared anathema and irredeemable and should be slain on sight." (or words to that effect)
Now that can raise some really fun questions:
1.) Is this the will of the paladin's deity, or just the will of the uppity-ups in the church heirarchy? Hm...."
____________________________________________________
End Quote.
Generally, it is the will of the King, the Church, and the Gods. As the Player's Handbook says, "The Paladin, Alhandra, fights against Evil without mercy..." (paraphrase) So, unless there is compelling evidence to the contrary, all such evil races are to be exterminated wherever they are found, "Root and Branch," as they used to say in the Dark Ages. There are a few individuals, and perhaps small groups that aren't necessarily evil, but out of millions and millions of creatures, over hundreds of years, they are very unusual, and numerically, insignificant. Policy and doctrine are not made because a few, somewhere, somehow, might be different. That consideration doesn't a policy make, you know? At the end of the day, a Cleric of the Vallorean Pantheon might say to a group of gathered paladins, knights, or soldiers, something from the Code of Drannicus,
"What of Barbarous Races?"
If the barbarous races fail to come to the light of the True Faith, and are exterminated in the fire and blood of war, what of it? If they be truly of pure soul, and have prostrated themselves in their heart before the True Gods, then the righteous gods shall recognize them as their souls are released to eternity, and they will be welcomed into Heaven, and be blessed with eternal rewards. Their lives of being born into a vile race shall be forgiven them at that time. After all, this mortal life is not so important. The greatest life is the eternal life to come in the Halls of Heaven with the True Gods. There, in those glorious, righteous halls, is found true reward, peace, and blessing. This wicked world is but a moment in time, and what happens to creatures here is of less importance to what their eternal destiny is. Individuals of such vile races that have foresworn their evil ways will be blessed in the afterlife, as their death was ultimately from the embracement of the evil race about them. They shall then be accounted righteous, and live in eternal glory with all other races who worship the True Gods!"
____________________________________________________
Quote:
"2.) Let us assume for a moment that it is the will of some of the uppity-ups but not the deity... in which case a paladin who follows orders from the uppity-ups might slay innocent non-combatants and despite being in good standing with the church, finds his powers "ripped" by the deity."
____________________________________________________
End Quote.
In such cases, the deity moves in mysterious ways that mortal minds cannot divine or penetrate. The paladin, while having the favour of the temporal Church, may still have displeased the deity in ways that the Church can not determine, and the paladin would still be punished in some way by the deity, and suffer whatever form of punishment and wrath that the deity has determined.
____________________________________________________
Quote:
"3.) Similarly, he might refrain from attacking noncombatants and retain his paladin powers but be censured by the church."
____________________________________________________
End Quote.
Non-combatants? In the Vallorean Empire many would see through a different paradigm--
"Evil races are seen as evil races--young or old, male or female, there is no distinction, but for their capacity to exercise and impose their evil will upon others. Is there a difference between a young, vile Rat, and an old, vile Rat? Between a male Rat and a female Rat? Nay, they are one and the same. The evil races are a vile, wicked plague upon the good earth, and they must be cleansed from the land. Their very existence is an affront to all that is good, holy, and righteous!"
Thus, the paladin may choose to not kill various members of evil races--but he must be sure of them not being evil, or he may be subject to censure by the gods or by the Church. Such races are not pure and innocent until one day they turn 18, and are now "evil." Such races, and such individuals, are evil long before that, and enjoy it thusly. The odd individual who isn't evil, isn't evil then--but it isn't based on their age or health, it's based on their convictions, faith, and lifestyle. If that non-evil creature's convictions, faith, and lifestyle isn't quickly and convincingly proven, then they are likely to be swallowed by the flame and death of war.
____________________________________________________
Quote:
"A whole host of similar situations can arise any time you get a code and a church heirarchy that is not directly led by the deity.
Now, granted, some of these infractions probably tick off both deity and church (e.g., rape) but what about the paladin who comes to be "enlightened" through experience rather than dogmatic following of the church?"
____________________________________________________
End Quote.
"Enlightened through experience?"--How so? What do you mean? In my mind, Paladins are not made in a vaccuum. Think of their abilities, their skills, their convictions. Paladins don't just wake up one day thinking, believing, and doing such things. They must be trained, disciplined, and instructed in such. A form of divine blessing and purpose may already be upon them, but that is divine potential, that must be realised and brought to fruition. I don't see paladins just doing all that by themselves, you know?
____________________________________________________
Quote:
"While I like the idea of a set of rigid codes and tribunals, I would like to add one more condition... the paladin's ability to irrevocably prove his worthiness/innocence. If the paladin is convicted in tribunal, he may appeal to his deity... and the proof comes in the pudding. An injured person is brought before the paladin, who must use his/her "lay on hands" ability to heal the injured (alternatively, the paladin must allow himself to be injured - flogged perhaps? - and then heal himself). If the paladin is in favor with his deity, he will retain the power to heal and hence his worthiness; if he is not able to heal, it is demonstrable proof of his unworthiness. In fact, such a request could obviate the need for trials altogether.
I suppose it would go without saying that someone (an uppity-up cleric?) who condemns the paladin as having committed an evil act and censures him for being unworthy - or someone who wrongfully accuses the paladin - will quickly find that by wrongfully censuring/condemning the paladin, he himself has come under displeasure of the deity and has his OWN powers stripped. Makes for serious judges and knocks down the number of frivolous charges, eh?
If the person honestly believed the paladin was unworthy, perhaps the god is lenient. For example, the cleric might honestly believe the charges that the paladin spared goblins and condemns him. When he finds out that these were goblin children, he lifts the condemnation. OTOH, a clergyman who condemns a paladin for staying his hand and exhibiting mercy to goblin children might well feel the displeasure of deity by having his OWN powers revoked until HE atoned for his bigotry.
Just some thoughts... hope they were clear enough. It just seems to me that all that is needed for a paladin to clear himself is to use his abilities... unless, of course, that falls under, "thou shalt not tempt the lord thy god..." "
____________________________________________________
End Quote.
Indeed, there can be mistakes made. I like that. Though many in the church are good and obedient servants of the gods, few of them are perfect. They make mistakes in judgment on occasion, just like paladins do. There is a broad degree between what mortals do normally, even with the best of intentions, and absolute holy and righteous perfection. That is an impossibly high standard that a mortal creature cannot attain--and the gods don't expect them to attain a level of unattainable perfection. Being mortal alone is an incompatible contradiction to that premise. The advantage it allows though is that while generally well-meaning, pious, righteous, and devout, as well as being quite efficient, the mortal followers of the pantheon make mistakes, and also have different occasions of corruption and vice. The temple needs to be disciplined as well from time to time, and those who have fallen to temptation either jduged through pennance and restored to service within the faith, or if severe enough, they too can be burned at the stake!
Semper Fidelis,
SHARK