cbwjm
Seb-wejem
Better yet, let's have so many that they all get cordoned off in their own forum.Let's have a Warlord thread!!!!
Better yet, let's have so many that they all get cordoned off in their own forum.Let's have a Warlord thread!!!!
Don't forget, we need a side order of HP=meat, nonmagical healing, and top it off with a nice juicy disociative dessert.
Wonder what kind of wine goes with disociative desserts?
More like through 2014.As far as why we "don't talk about fourth edition", well, there's a very good reason for that. One only has to peruse the forums from about 2008-2010 to see why we don't talk about fourth edition. It was impossible to talk about without it turning into a giant edition war ....
Until 5e was out and clearly successful, the edition war may have waxed & waned, but it was still ongoing. And, while over & the victor clear, it still flares up whenever - as in this thread - something even /slightly/ positive might pop up on the topic of 4e.... Imagine it was like that for every single thread, every single day, for three or four YEARS and that's what it was like to talk about 4e.
Don't forget, we need a side order of HP=meat, nonmagical healing, and top it off with a nice juicy disociative dessert.
Wonder what kind of wine goes with disociative desserts?
Wonder what kind of wine goes with disociative desserts?
"Chateau d'Emmersions, '74, a fine ex-The kind with an H in it, I think?
3e characters have more. Bear's Endurance for-the-Meats … I mean 'Win.'Well, I love HP = Meat, because that means that 5e characters are Arby's.
THEY HAVE ALL THE MEATS!
More like through 2014.
Until 5e was out and clearly successful, the edition war may have waxed & waned, but it was still ongoing. And, while over & the victor clear, it still flares up whenever - as in this thread - something even /slightly/ positive might pop up on the topic of 4e.
(my bet is no. You'll be an old old man, 10e will launch, someone'll say something you don't like about 4e & off you'll go.)
The edition war got called "the edition war" rather than the 'edition discussion' or the 'edition debate' or even 'the edition controversy,' because, quite apart from "who started it" (WotC, by making 4e! No! fans by complaining about 3.5! No! Gygax by writing Chainmail!), both sides repeatedly crossed lines of bare-minimum, simple civility that they shouldn't've.That's because, even after all these years, 4e fans completely overreact the moment someone
says something slightly disparaging about the edition.
I am already an old man. At the historical rate of edition churn, with my "health challenges," I'll be lucky to see a 7e.You'll be an old old man, 10e will launch