Feminously Gendered Feline Hivemind Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rystil Arden said:
Antihero

n : a protagonist who lacks the characteristics that would make him a hero (or her a heroine)

So this means that by definition...
Going by the third and fifth defintions here, an antihero is not necessarily a protagonist, by virtue of not being a hero.

When my point is that it depends on what definition you use, isn't it silly just to list one definition?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Jdvn1 said:
Going by the third and fifth defintions here, an antihero is not necessarily a protagonist, by virtue of not being a hero.

When my point is that it depends on what definition you use, isn't it silly just to list one definition?
If you accept that the word antihero exists, then you must accept that it can be a protagonist because it was created specifically to describe a protagonist that is not a hero. There is no other literary definition for an antihero beyond those bounds ;)

Anyways, you are the one who first used an exclusive worldview in definition when you claimed that Anakin could not be the protagonist of RotS ;)

No, I've seen it, but I'm not sure what you're talking about. Anakin is hardly a protagonist

When he tries to kill Obiwan, I'd take awa 'protagonist' status from him. When he turns on everyone, same thing.
 

Rystil Arden said:
If you accept that the word antihero exists, then you must accept that it can be a protagonist because it was created specifically to describe a protagonist that is not a hero. There is no other literary definition for an antihero beyond those bounds ;)
Well, the third and fifth defintions at the link I posted disagree with you. You don't have to give them credence, but it does mean that I don't have to accept that an anti-hero describes a protagonist that is not a hero.
Rystil Arden said:
Anyways, you are the one who first used an exclusive worldview in definition when you claimed that Anakin could not be the protagonist of RotS ;)
Hm, true. I shouldn't have used absolutes. I didn't think of Anakin as a protagonist, really.
 

My brain now hurts at the sheer geekyness of this conversation...there is not enough fire here....

*wanders off in search of fire*
 

Lady_Acoma said:
My brain now hurts at the sheer geekyness of this conversation...there is not enough fire here....

*wanders off in search of fire*
Oh, sorry.

And then Anakin catches on fire, and later Vader's body is burned.

Happy? ;)
 


Rystil Arden said:
Yes, burned, burned by a tiny little ember without actually touching the lava. Weird stuff!
Did he not? I don't recall, but I thought he just barely touched it. Or maybe the rock around the lava was hot enough to catch him on fire?

Regardless, he was well on his was to being a piece of charcoal.
 


Jdvn1 said:
Did he not? I don't recall, but I thought he just barely touched it. Or maybe the rock around the lava was hot enough to catch him on fire?

Regardless, he was well on his was to being a piece of charcoal.
Yup. But Obi-Wan so should have just finished him :D
 

Rystil Arden said:
Yup. But Obi-Wan so should have just finished him :D
Oh, definitely. I don't know why he didn't, except maybe because he knew there'd be six episodes afterwards. :lol:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top