Some people have received their copies of Fizban's Treasury of Dragons, and have posted photos (including the table of contents!) online!
The entire FR wiki is written in past tense, BTW.All that sounded past tense
I feel similarly unhappy about how they treat the Dark Powers in VRGtR. While they give a few options as to their exact nature, all of those options take for granted that they are some sort of multiple actual beings, which is too much to assume. Ravenloft could be a sentient plane, or it could just have a few completely non-sentient planar features like a law of poetic justice, an entrapping feature that is magnetically drawn to certain types of acts of evil, etc. Or there could be even less than that going on. "You think there is someone(s) out there controlling all this? Too bad for you, you don't even have that. Just a mindless plane that is somehow attractive to evil stuff. Enjoy the utter meaningless of your existence."Even then, the whole thing about Eberron's lore is that it has intentional gaps. Not only in in-world knowledge. Not even Keith Baker has the answer for this things. Having the progenitors be real, even if nobody in world knows it, sets a standard, and answer one of the biggest questions of the setting (Are gods real?), and every single table that answers that question with "no" will be deviating form canon (a lot of people don't care about that, I know, but a lot do).
Well the new one would because of the mythic trait, but if you gave the old one the mythic trait it would win.Would the old or new Tiamat statblock win in combat?