Flash - please no spoilers

Sorry, my bad! I was sure that one had been spoiled already by all the reviews, but I guess I was wrong.






















( Atomic llamas did it.)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

To be spoiled by the reviews, I'd have to read the reviews. But I don't, because I know I'd get spoiled.

No biggie, though - I don't actually know who Stagg is.
 

Yeah, we need a spoiler policy here. I got spoiled in my most recent Doctor Who thread. I'll give it some thought.
 

Is there a way for me ban hammer Danny A. for a micro second for punishment of spoiling in my thread [/just kidding]
 

The Stagg thing isn't much of a spoiler, he's more of an annoyance than a real villain in the DC universe, despite his 'connections' and since we didn't see Mr Java as a neanderthal either it seems they were making changes anyway. What the implications are for Stagg Enterprises is intriguing though...
 



I think introducing spoiler thread tags in thread titles is the way to go. If it has [spoilers] in the title, then spoil away. If it doesn't, keep it spoiler free. Simple and easy!

Shows might have multiple threads that way, but that's fine!
 

for Danny, the use of spoiler][/spoiler] might be of benifit, such as:

"I hated it when
such and such happened to so and so
. You know what I mean?"

I still like the idea of being able to ban hammering Danny for a microsecond or two.
 

for Danny, the use of spoiler][/spoiler] might be of benifit, such as:

"I hated it when
such and such happened to so and so
. You know what I mean?"

I used to use that formatting until I found that it leaves the text visible when using a mobile browser. The SBLOCK tags work better.
 

Remove ads

Top