Flash - please no spoilers

[Dannyalcatraz]

Sorry, my bad! I was sure that one had been spoiled already by all the reviews, but I guess I was wrong.






















( Atomic llamas did it.)

 

[MarkB]

To be spoiled by the reviews, I'd have to read the reviews. But I don't, because I know I'd get spoiled.

No biggie, though - I don't actually know who Stagg is.

 

[Morrus]

Yeah, we need a spoiler policy here. I got spoiled in my most recent Doctor Who thread. I'll give it some thought.

 

[Scott DeWar]

Is there a way for me ban hammer Danny A. for a micro second for punishment of spoiling in my thread [/just kidding]

 

[Tonguez]

The Stagg thing isn't much of a spoiler, he's more of an annoyance than a real villain in the DC universe, despite his 'connections' and since we didn't see Mr Java as a neanderthal either it seems they were making changes anyway. What the implications are for Stagg Enterprises is intriguing though...

 

[Scott DeWar]

Well, stopping the sales of the STAGGberry phone might be a little tricky.

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

Avoiding spoilers is easier if there is a formatting button for putting things ins a spoiler block.

 

[Morrus]

I think introducing spoiler thread tags in thread titles is the way to go. If it has [spoilers] in the title, then spoil away. If it doesn't, keep it spoiler free. Simple and easy!

Shows might have multiple threads that way, but that's fine!

 

[Scott DeWar]

for Danny, the use of spoiler][/spoiler] might be of benifit, such as:

"I hated it when

Spoiler

such and such happened to so and so

. You know what I mean?"

I still like the idea of being able to ban hammering Danny for a microsecond or two.

 

[MarkB]

for Danny, the use of spoiler][/spoiler] might be of benifit, such as:

"I hated it when

Spoiler

such and such happened to so and so

. You know what I mean?"

I used to use that formatting until I found that it leaves the text visible when using a mobile browser. The SBLOCK tags work better.