Jack99
Adventurer
I can see you really do not want to be around, if I ever cared enough to get offensive.
Was that just an invisible strawman?
Just because I think some of the combinations possible with the enormous amount of options there was in 3.x are retarded, it doesn't mean that I think that anyone using/liking the many options of 3.x are retarded. Or that I find their way of gaming retarded. Towards the end, I owned just about every 3.5 book released by WotC. And all classes/PRCs were fair game in my last campaign(s), with very very few exceptions. So we used plenty of weird combinations of classes as well. Again, further proof that I am not attacking anyone's style of play.
I just prefer quality over quantity. I prefer a well-thought out product, with balanced (read as non-broken) classes, spells, powers or feats. No matter the edition.
Cheers
You have.
"Retarded combinations"? How could you think that that wouldn't come across as offensive?
Was that just an invisible strawman?
Just because I think some of the combinations possible with the enormous amount of options there was in 3.x are retarded, it doesn't mean that I think that anyone using/liking the many options of 3.x are retarded. Or that I find their way of gaming retarded. Towards the end, I owned just about every 3.5 book released by WotC. And all classes/PRCs were fair game in my last campaign(s), with very very few exceptions. So we used plenty of weird combinations of classes as well. Again, further proof that I am not attacking anyone's style of play.
I just prefer quality over quantity. I prefer a well-thought out product, with balanced (read as non-broken) classes, spells, powers or feats. No matter the edition.
Cheers