Mouseferatu
Hero
ColonelHardisson said:When it comes to consumerism, it's always a bad idea to simply assume one is being treated well and keep quiet. Just as it's the "duty," so to speak, of a company to charge as much as it can for its products, it is also the "duty" of the consumer to try to get companies to sell their products as cheaply as possible. I don't assume we're getting screwed, but I also don't assume a corporate entity has my best interests in mind, either.
There's a difference, however, between "Man, isn't there any way for you to sell these books cheaper?" and "D00d! WoTC is so ripping us off!! I could buy books this book for $15 when I was 9. Only reason I cant now is because Wotc are a bunch of
I have no problem with the first. I have a serious problem with the second. And while the second might be a bit of an exaggeration to some, most of us have seen the attitude, if not the exact phrasing. (And I've seen some phrasing that comes pretty close.)
I wouldn't expect people to assume that a company has their best interests at heart. But neither is it appropriate to assume that every move they make is designed to screw over their customers.


