*Found the quote about size:Pretty good.Clarification: does he still use the +4 from Improved Trip (or increased size for that matter) on the opposed str check? What about somebody Bull Rushed into a wall or other obstacle, does that allow a (simple) Trip attempt as well?
Yes to the +4, but Ur isn't large. I'm fairly certain I specified that you could take knockback as though you were large, but would NOT be getting the size bonuses.RE: Knockback - I've read the feat now, and would be willing to allow it to you, but keep in mind that since you aren't actually large, you do not get the large size bonus to the strength check.
That's what knowledge checks and Trial/Error are for. If I gave out their stats at the beginning that would allow PC's the ability to calculate their best odds of success with different attack forms.I'm sort of hoping you'll give out AC and Str bonuses on our opponents so I can work out the effects of Ur's attacks in my posts. Else it's going to be a lot of "If pushed back at least 10' into *that* guy's square, then trip attempt and use remaining attacks on this other guy. If pushed back just 5', then, etc, etc".
Scott -
Looks good as far as I can see. Spells are right, though wondering why you have Elemental Body listed as Elemental Body III - I'm assuming it's just the Elemental body spell from Spell Compendium, right?
Most of your wands seem fairly redundant and weak..

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.