General Discussion Thread X

[Rystil Arden]

I'll settle for any game at the moment, but keep me in mind if you could for something involving dervishes later if you would. I've got 3 characters waiting to play, but it'd be nice to have an adventure where she does her trial, probably a bit down the road though.

I think Wik was going to run a sequal to the Blacklily game? Solange is willing to wait for that one, so she's going to lurk outside of the tavern for a while.

Is there anything other than the tavern to do between adventures?

Nope, only the tavern. As I've said a few times, there will eventually be a mega-adventure with more than six subsidiary adventures, coming soon (when SatFR moves a bit more--I'm not even necessarily going to wait for the end anymore). This should allow people with multiple idle characters to play them all, unless all of the multiple characters are the same level (since the adventures are for a variety of levels--for instance one may be for levels 1 and up, one may be for levels 8 and up, etc).

 

[Patlin]

I've closed out two of the three adventures I'm DMing, and if I get back to a point where I feel I have some control over the pacing of the remaining one I might consider getting another one going... possibly in conjunction with RA. We both have some pretty big ideas, which might work well together.

 

[Rystil Arden]

I've closed out two of the three adventures I'm DMing, and if I get back to a point where I feel I have some control over the pacing of the remaining one I might consider getting another one going... possibly in conjunction with RA. We both have some pretty big ideas, which might work well together.

You know, you still haven't told me what your plan is yet

 

[Solange]

Nope, only the tavern. As I've said a few times, there will eventually be a mega-adventure with more than six subsidiary adventures, coming soon (when SatFR moves a bit more--I'm not even necessarily going to wait for the end anymore). This should allow people with multiple idle characters to play them all, unless all of the multiple characters are the same level (since the adventures are for a variety of levels--for instance one may be for levels 1 and up, one may be for levels 8 and up, etc).

I have 3 level 1, 2 that have yet to join an adventure.

 

[Rae ArdGaoth]

I might be willing to run a Sairundan adventure. What did you have in mind?

 

[Bront]

Is there anything other than the tavern to do between adventures?

There is the job system. Look it up in the rules thread.

 

[Solange]

I might be willing to run a Sairundan adventure. What did you have in mind?

Anything realy. Ideally, Shadya is leaving to explore the world, but perhaps she'll have some kind of adventure in Sairundan before she makes it all the way to Orussus, maybe meeting some of the other low levelers lingering in the tavern (as there seem to be a few). Or, if someone is looking to travel back to Sairundan, perhaps she could go along as a guide as she knows the area?

Let me know, and I can move her into the tavern and Rapture out if you want to recruit in there.

There is the job system. Look it up in the rules thread.

Oh, that's handy at least. Guess my characters can at least earn a little extra coin.

 

[B4cchus]

During an encounter in Ashin's commission: the great escape i encountered an unforseen situation regarding the Fury of the Wolverine feat.
The feat allows an instant rage when the character sustains more than 1/2 his hitpoints in damage during an encounter. The feat description does not discriminate between leathal and non-lethal damage.
I hereby suggest that only lethal damage counts for the feat.
Since it is a such a small addition to the feat i think this is easily settled in the GD thread instead of a new proposal...

 

[Rystil Arden]

During an encounter in Ashin's commission: the great escape i encountered an unforseen situation regarding the Fury of the Wolverine feat.
The feat allows an instant rage when the character sustains more than 1/2 his hitpoints in damage during an encounter. The feat description does not discriminate between leathal and non-lethal damage.
I hereby suggest that only lethal damage counts for the feat.
Since it is a such a small addition to the feat i think this is easily settled in the GD thread instead of a new proposal...

I agree. As I pointed out in the other thread, anything else could result in barbarian hunger rages

 

[Bront]

I'd still propose it, but I'm amenable to that addition.