Particle_Man
Explorer
Ha ha, thanks. We were playing a sort of mix of Mentzer and Moldvay - whichever book a person grabbed, that was the set of rules he was following.
I trust the player of the thief was canny enough to grab the Moldvay.

Ha ha, thanks. We were playing a sort of mix of Mentzer and Moldvay - whichever book a person grabbed, that was the set of rules he was following.
I trust the player of the thief was canny enough to grab the Moldvay.![]()
Its been a while since I've read through either - is there a significant difference?
Its been a while since I've read through either - is there a significant difference?
Yes, I am curious as well . . .![]()
No, it most certainly was not supposed to say that; as fun like that truly can last forever...says he, almost 30 years into it, it's still fun.Was that supposed to say "can't last forever"?
Your loss, I suppose...For me this kind of thing is a trip down memory lane. I will enjoy playing a one-shot once every couple of years, but no more. I wouldn't stand having to play a whole campaign.
Was that supposed to say "can't last forever"?
For me this kind of thing is a trip down memory lane. I will enjoy playing a one-shot once every couple of years, but no more. I wouldn't stand having to play a whole campaign.
Ah, BECMI. My go-to edition as well, although I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I usually use Tom Moldvay's or even Troy Denning's Basic Set instead of Frank Mentzer's. But of course there's only one Expert Set worth bringing to the tabletop, and it ain't the one that Zeb and Steve wrote.