* * * Greyhawk Castle: EGG and RJK talking about publication!

[Grazzt]

Maybe but I think we can thank Scott and Clarke along with Gary for how GOOD it is.

Thanks Nightfall..but don't forget Bill Webb (Froggy on here)...he did as much as Clark and I did (ok- maybe not quite as much, but close. )

 

[laurencio]

That's great news! I hope they get past the "thinking about it" stage and get it published this time.

 

[Katerek]

I am not a big fan of either of their stuff, but I would buy something like this just on general principle.

 

[grodog]

That's great news! I hope they get past the "thinking about it" stage and get it published this time.

Hear hear, laurencio! Some of us have been waiting for the Castle since 1978 or so, others much longer I'm sure ;->

 

[Ricochet]

Let the saliva drip!

 

[Leopold]

well if this is the (grey hawk ruins?) 30level dungeon one then they are either:

a. going to have to get permission from WOTC to use the names of the gods (boccob, nerul, vaprak)

b. Nix that and just create new gods to match that book.



My hope is A. that and they do it with D20 rules and not hackmaster which i dislike greatly. Give me the good D20 system in this tower and I will be like gravy.

Either way, I still converted it into 3e so I got a copy no matter what

 

[Flexor the Mighty!]

Sounds like a winner to me. I'd love to grind the party down in the dungeons of castle Greyhawk! Mwhaa..haa...haa...haaaaaaaaaa....

 

[grodog]

well if this is the (grey hawk ruins?) 30level dungeon one then they are either:

a. going to have to get permission from WOTC to use the names of the gods (boccob, nerul, vaprak)

b. Nix that and just create new gods to match that book.

I think it's much more likely that B would be the option, with a few names that EGG owns appearing, but most original Greyhawk names being changed to protect WotC's IP.