Greyhawk Setting Ressurected? Sorta Kinda..

Status
Not open for further replies.
I lived and did not memorize it ......but then i am currently tired.
Mystera was named in the cartoon and later became the basis for the basic world. this was about 1979 or 1980. forgotten Realms was making the rounds about the same time and yes I rememebr that Mystera was a rehash of Blackmoor (little book) to some extent but it was changed and would be considered a different world look at Arnesson's map (made by him in 1969) and compare them both.
Darius

p.s. i am not really trying to argue history or anything cause it really doesn't matter ( to me anyway). IT IS A GAME...who cares.
Oh and I also forgot to mention Ravenloft and Dragonlance and spelljammer....ect....hmmmm Dragonlance was before Ravenloft but Ravenloft was more popular when it came out....ramble ramble mummble mummble....night again......spelljammer..grumble...gamma world ....everquest...sleeep.....Traveler was games designers workshop but not the 'games workshop'..hahaha and what does any of this have to do with them making a new Greyhawk? NOTHING ....zzzzzzzz.zzzzzz:o zzzzzzzzzz
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

The original Blackmoor debuted in 1975, according to this website http://www.pen-paper.net/rpgdb.php?op=showbook&bookid=2471

Since we know that Dungeons and Dragons got its actual start in 1974 (because the Silver Anniversary boxed set was released in 1999), that means Blackmoor, which was still Mystara, was released about a year after the D&D came out.

Adventures in Blackmoor and Temple of the Frog both set in the Known World, came out in 1986 according to the same website. Mystara/the Known World wasn't so much a rehash of Blackmoor as it was an expansion. The rest of the world beyond Blackmoor was described. Thusly, Blackmoor is the first incarnation of Mystara/the Known World, despite what Arneson may say (thats what happens when there are creative differences internally in a company).

The Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting premiered in 1987 ( http://www.pen-paper.net/rpgdb.php?op=showbook&bookid=1255 ), and the first module that was understood to be part of the Realms (even without the logo) was Bloodstone Pass, released in 1985 ( http://www.pen-paper.net/rpgdb.php?op=showbook&bookid=2040 ) years after the original Blackmoor.

As for Greyhawk, the first book with that name premiered in 1976, a year after the release of Blackmoor. See here for that http://www.pen-paper.net/rpgdb.php?op=showbook&bookid=2470

Your basic premise is that the original Blackmoor is not truely part of Mystara, which later products prove it is.

FInally, I'm not trying to argue either, but just having lived history doesn't mean one has a perfect recollection of it. And to some of us gamers, game history can be important, that's why we're geeks. :D

EDIT: A quick check at the Acaeum ( www.acaeum.com) on Blackmoor turned up this webpage http://www.acaeum.com/DDIndexes/SetPages/Supplements.html which proves that the Greyhawk supplement was released first, then Blackmoor. So Greyhawk is older!
 
Last edited:

http://www.castleblackmoor.com/
This is daves site and he explains very well the hisotry being a history buff himself.......you can also goto:
www.gygax.com and ask the man himself...or if you can find Rob Kuntz ask him.
Now as to your points (i guess i am not going to get any sleep tonight now am I) .......

"One common myth is the Chainmail, by E G Gygax, was the origin of the rules for D&D. This is not the case. Dave had been playing for quite some time before then and when a new combat system was requested he looked into Chainmail, only to find it too complicated and hard to adapt for his players."

I am not talking about when stuff was premiered but when it was being play tested and played for real by real roleplayers.
I have been to the website you posted and it is a nice place to visit. It goes by published dates only. We all know that just publishing it does not make it set it in stone as correct.
For example: http://www.steigerwaldedv.via.t-online.de/vintyri/canon.htm
Tells the history of the forgotten realms as releted by Ed Greenwood and also details what WOTC anbd TSR did to ED's world. It will be under the Northern Journey campaign guide:
http://www.steigerwaldedv.via.t-online.de/vintyri/njdownld.htm


Adventures in Blackmoor and Temple of the Frog both set in the Known World, came out in 1986 according to the same website.

Adventures in blackmoor and the temple of the frog are modules and not cannon for the actual Blackmoor. Have you yourself read those modules? Blackmoor was an entirely self contained area of a world that was not Blackmoor (by Arnesson). You can now purchase the ESD for $5 and read it and compare it to the original book which is a free download at www.blackmoor.com


Since we know that Dungeons and Dragons got its actual start in 1974 (because the Silver Anniversary boxed set was released in 1999), that means Blackmoor, which was still Mystara, was released about a year after the D&D came out.
Actually it was published in 1974 but it got it's start much earlier by a group of 'guys' that loved wargames and wanted to expand on it. Again ask Gary or Dave about the origin it was 1968 or 1969 when they really started to play with it. TSR began to publish it in 1974 - 1975. The silver anniversary was to mark the publishing debut of the basic set. They gave out the first books in 1972 or 1973 and they were self published and given mostly as gifts to the core players.


Your basic premise is that the original Blackmoor is not truely part of Mystara, which later products prove it is.
I did not say it was not truely part of Blackmoor but it was added to it and becme the world for which Basic D&D was based on. It WAS NOT part of the original map published by Dave and copyrighted 1969 - 2002. It was supported to be sure because TSR had to have Basic, Expert and the rest to play in that world as a basis and Greyhawk was used for AD&D.
Remember do not ever rely on only one source for your information. By doing that you limit your knowledge base and limit your thinking allot.
Now I have just given you about 300pages of further reading. Please remeber that just cause it is published it is true....or that the publishing date is the true origin of something like a roleplaying game.
I played in Forgotten Realms in 1983-1984 at a convention. I played with guys who told me the history of the game....some were right some were not. IT IS A GAME...you should ask why do we need to know the history ? cause we are geeks? sometimes..but more importantly someone should write it all up and publish it someday right.....Who invented Monopoly ? is that a roleplaying game?? some would consider it so...some play it like it is.
Is chess a board game or is it a sport?
Is go a just a game or does it contain elements of roleplaying in it?
How long has Role-playing exsisted? As long as charades or some 700+years?
Is basic good story telling a form of role-playing and if so then role-playing is as old as man but the rules are now written down for all to see and utilize for storytelling. Think outside the box .....
Traveller was published in 1975 as well.....Starfleet battles was published around 1978 or so (memory is a funny thing it is) is that as important as the game itself? it can be i guess. But it is secondary to the game itself living on.
These same things about history are present in three of my hobbies at present:
Magic
Prop Collecting
D&D
History is not an essential part of the enjoyment of any of these hobbies to me. But it is a way to pay homage to the pregenators of my crafts. (Magic and Prop making). Less so with D&D than the other two.
How many people will remember that Hofzinzer created modern card magic? None if it never comes up in casual conversation.
Marlo created hundreds of sleight of hand card magic but, many remember him as never letting the spectator shuffle cards.

Who would like to own a screen used Lucas arts Lightsaber?
Any Star wars fan right and some woulf pay 30,000+ to own it.
Wouldn't it be cool to have the original props from the Trk TV show? sure but the originals look like crapazoids and cost more than a small house. Why? Cause people pay for history. Can they prove it ? most of the time no they cannot prove it was screen used unless it comes from the studio itself. COA's can be created by anyone with a computer now a days. so people are very careful about how they buy now.
My point is if your not in the hobby or your in the hobby who cares unless it is brought up or will cost ya some cash....
Darius

p.s. the 'true print' that is discussed at the site in the post above this one does not mention what GK stands for----it stands for Gygax and Kuntz and these were done up to pass out when it was shown around. Well, sold actually. They make no mention of the hand typed rules that went out and all these little books were self published as the beginings of TSR.
 
Last edited:

My thoughts on the matter, cut-and-pasted from a thread on the Necromancer boards...

I was never what you'd call a Greyhawk fanatic, but I did appreciate many aspects of the world, and I enjoyed what few of the GH products I owned.

That said, I find this news very disappointing. I don't play Hackmaster. I don't have any interest in Hackmaster. If I wanted to play 1st/2nd edition D&D, I'd just break out my old books. I wouldn't have to buy any new material, and I'd know that half the world wasn't meant to be a joke.

The fact that this is going to be a Hackmaster product means I won't touch it. :(

It's too bad. If they'd done a real Greyhawk supplement, with all the old feel, for D&D 3E, I'd have snapped it up in a heartbeat.
 

[his one does not mention what GK stands for----it stands for Gygax and Kuntz

Uhm...I'm afraid you are wrong...It stands for Gygax and Don Kaye, Gary's original business partner and dear friend who passed away not long after D&D was released.
 


Re: Mysteria ?? old ??

Darius101 said:
Yes Greyhawk does have a long history and yes WOTC has screwed it all up, along with Frogotten realms. It would be nice to see it return if it was done correctly. They should allow fans to help it come out right.
See now there's the crux of my dilemma. You see, WHICH fans should have input? A snowball would have a better chance in Hades than would anyone of getting the various GH fan factions to work together, so that's out.

One group will have to win. Currently I'm thinking that the group that will win will be the old school minority. To me, that's a bad thing. That will mean the scrapping of most of the stuff that I like about Greyhawk.

You see... GH fans are... somewhat... factionalized. A good example would be a Lawful Evil organization. Sure, everyone works towards a common goal and places the state above their own importance... but everyone has a different view of just how the state should be run and is willing to KILL to see that THEIR view is the dominant one.

It's truly tragic. Just go to Dragonsfoot or Pied Piper Publishing and mention, off-hand, that you love 3rd ed and the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer and you'll get a right royal pummelling. Ever heard the saying, "Three-tards"? That's the term hard core EGG fans and die-hard 1st ed fans use when referring to anyone who likes d20 or Living Greyhawk.

But 3rd ed people are just as bad at name calling. I despise 2nd ed with a passion but I've learned that edition bashing is not only pointless but entirely lame. A lot of people, however, seem to indulge in it from both sides of the fence. And Greyhawkers, having been bred in all editions, are the WORST offenders, I assure you.

So you see... Kenzer doing Greyhawk is not necessarily a good thing. At least not for ALL fans. And although it would be wonderful if fans had input, at the end of the day, a LOT of people are going to feel burnt because THEIR favourite whatever wasn't the winner.

Now if WotC would simply let there be multiple licenses, so that all editions and factions could prosper, multiply and benefit, then this wouldn't be a problem. But they hold on to those licenses like they're some sort of holy grail and what's worse, they don't do ANYTHING for the setting. Core world my fat hairy butt.
 



Hi all---

I'm not going to delve into the historical arguments of this thread, save for some quick comments after my main point:

Woohoo! :D

I'm very excited to see Kenzer doing GH again, and hope that EGG and RJK will be as involved as possible in the project. Preferably as part of an effort to publish Castle Greyhawk, too!

Now, back to the arguments :D Among published game worlds, the correct campaign history is:

1. Blackmoor (per the OD&D supplment, then as "First Fantasy Campaign" from Judges Guild, then as part of Greyhawk, then as DA1-4 and the merger with the Mystara/Known World D&D Setting)

(Aside: I don't recall when the Mystara/Known World settings were named such, but I don't believe that they were originally called that in the Erol Otus cover basic/expert sets).

2. Greyhawk (per the OD&D supplement, then the Dragon articles, and the 1980 folio, 1983 box set, etc., etc.)

3. Khalibrun (Rob Kuntz's world, first published in 1987 under his Creations Unlmited banner)

Somewhere after there the history gets quite mixed up, since Jim Ward, Skip Williams, etc. all had their own game worlds, too. Some of Jim's stuff was published in The Dragon and much later independently via his various ventures.

The FR was introduced much later in 1987, although Greenwood's FR articles began to appear back in the days of The Dragon, too.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top