To be clear, this isn't my normal ID (protect the innocent and all that).
I appreciate all the input, its making me feel a lot better. A couple points: I playtested the book in question. At the beginning of my review I clearly stated I was a playtester for the publisher. I know this really straddles the line of appropriateness, but I felt I could give an objective review. I really don't want to "out" the company because I think they put out really great product. The intent isn't to harm to company, I just don't know if I want to associate with them anymore due to what's occured.
Psion said "Fans can smell fawnishness. A positive but discerning review is far more credible that one that recognizes no error." Exactly, that's why I think I was actually a little harder on it than I normally would be. I figured if I fawned over it, as you say, no one would take the review seriously.
jerichothebard asked
1 - did you playtest the product that you playtested? No
2 - were you paid for playtesting any of their products, whether you reviewed it or not? (and by paid, I mean any form of compensation beyond the free playtest copy and your name in the credits) No
3 - Do you feel your review was unfair? No
DanMcS said: "What were they going to do if you didn't pull the review, kidnap your kitten and send you little tufts of fur taped to threatening notes?"
No, but as I said, I've already got a bit of a working relationship with them. I'm trying to get some writing work as well. I want to make it clear no overt threats were made regarding me pulling the review. It was mainly a guilt-trip.
Cergorach said "friends on the otherhand have the oppertunity to make an appology"
I thought of this person as a friend. However, their vehemence despite my attempts at explaination, really force me to question whether this is a two-way street.
Thanks again for your input.