tsadkiel
Legend
I just picked it up about two hours ago and I like it much more than I expected I would. I had some quibbles with the classes based on the previews (they seemed more teenager-oriented than kid-oriented) but looking at the full six levels, I'm pleased, especially after reminding myself that these aren't real kids, they're stereotypical kids. Still not wild about the class names though; Jock and Nerd are too Breakfast Club for me, but I'll deal.
The rules are flexible enough to handle a variety of Kid-Lit settings; the book could handle Narnia, Neverland, my beloved Oz books, or even Harry Potter without much trouble.
The actual Fairy Tale characters presented are kind of a mixed bag; I loved their take on Cinderella, Little Bo Peep, Jack, and the Dwarfs. I'm kind of meh on Little Red Riding Hood and Rapunzel. But (with the possible exception of Humpty Dumpty) none of the characters are essential to the setting. Different interpretations could easily be swapped in. Considering the nature of the world, they could even coexist with the book versions.
The thing that really won me over, though, was the GMing advice, of all things. The notion of famous characters as failed heroic precursors is just cool.
The rules are flexible enough to handle a variety of Kid-Lit settings; the book could handle Narnia, Neverland, my beloved Oz books, or even Harry Potter without much trouble.
The actual Fairy Tale characters presented are kind of a mixed bag; I loved their take on Cinderella, Little Bo Peep, Jack, and the Dwarfs. I'm kind of meh on Little Red Riding Hood and Rapunzel. But (with the possible exception of Humpty Dumpty) none of the characters are essential to the setting. Different interpretations could easily be swapped in. Considering the nature of the world, they could even coexist with the book versions.
The thing that really won me over, though, was the GMing advice, of all things. The notion of famous characters as failed heroic precursors is just cool.
Last edited: