Orcus said:I was a bit grouchy today, and it came through in my posts. I posted some thoughts I was having. But that shouldnt change the fact that I trust the people at Wizards to do this and to do it right. I know Linae and Scott are good people. I know this will get ironed out.
Ydars said:Take Games Workshop for example. They are a very successful company that makes business decisions that make perfect business sense, they just end up destroying whole swaves of the RPG market. They have just completely cut the most successful RPG of this year (at least in the UK it was outselling D&D 4:1) Dark Heresy because it doesn't fit in with their short-term business plans anymore. I see the same one day happening to D&D after they have alienated so many of us that no-one buys it anymore.
carmachu said:I keep hearing that from you and others, adn I'll take your word for it. But perhaps you're asking the wrong question. Instead of asking/saying you trust the folks at WotC, do you trust Hasbro to come through? Ultimately they pull the strings.
mxyzplk said:Oh, I totally agree.
1. They'll make sure and delay the "closed" announcement till after June (because they want to sell books to people that wouldn't buy if they heard "closed" but will give in when it's "undefined".
2. They'll wait till after gen Con so they don't have flash mobs chanting "OGL! OGL!" at the Wizards area in the dealer room all the time.
3. Then they'll announce that no, it won't be open, and that there's some super secret licensing scheme that they'll discuss with "reputable companies." They'll then extract money from the big 3ps to put out D&D branded stuff.
All this is decided now, it's just being timed so as to avoid "unfortunate side effects", like havingto deal with the fact that a very large percentage (20%, according to the poll) of their customers don't like this.
Orcus said:OK, I say 4E is open, to some degree such as a GSL. Maybe not all the way as the OGL. But I dont think it will just be by super-secret individual licenses.
Dinner at GenCon. Takers?
Lizard said:Can we define 'open' as "No fee required for production of supplements after some reasonable date"?
Just to be clear: I can take the bet, fully expecting to lose, and my penalty is being able to take you out to dinner at Gen Con?Orcus said:Dinner at GenCon. Takers?
catsclaw said:Just to be clear: I can take the bet, fully expecting to lose, and my penalty is being able to take you out to dinner at Gen Con?
That seems to be a rather big loophole, right there.
Orcus said:Yeah, but you have to buy and I like sushi--lots of sushi.
Oh, and Seanchi is coming along![]()