Ashrem Bayle said:
Its isn't really a gripe, its just that it defeats the purpose of the Dragon Disciple prestige class.
I disagree.
Ashrem Bayle said:
Previously, if a player wanted a half-dragon character, and his DM was starting them at 1st level, his only choice was the Dragon Disciple.
You can't be a Dragon Disciple at 1st level. Heck, you can't be one until 6th.
But that's still not the point. If you want to start out as a spellcaster and evolve into it, you go DD. If you were born one and want to go from there you take the racial levels (or just the tempate if you can afford the +3 ECL).
Ashrem Bayle said:
Now, with the Template Class as an option, I don't see why you would take the Prestige Class. It basicly replaces the need for it.
As I just said, this sin't the case. They are two different things with two different sets of abilities/powers/features/etc.
The HD gets more ability score bumps and a better breath weapon and elemental immunity (until DD reaches full 10th level), for example. But the DD eventually gets wings (even when smaller than Large) and Blindsense. Plus the DD is picking up a few bonus spell slots that you don't get with the template.
Ashrem Bayle said:
Surely a Half-Dragon 3 / Sorcerer 12 is a much more powerful character than than a Sorcerer 5 / Dragon Disciple 10.
Show me. And what do you mean by "powerful"?
Sure, if you start off at 15th level, this may (or may not) be the case. But what if you had to start at 5th? Would you go Sorcerer 5 or Half-Dragon 3 / Sorcerer 2? I think that's a much more difficult choice. Possibly even a reversal?
Or worse, what if <gasp> you had to start at 1st level? Then what?
Ashrem Bayle said:
In my opinion, it is also a better class as I always thought the Dragon Disciple was too weak.
Yet, oddly, that is not my opinion. I believe they both have an equal place in the scheme of things. Both have advantages and disadvantages, as I've illustrated.