Steel_Wind said:
This one misses out onf the FUN of being in Hogwarts.
It wasn't really that fun of a year for Harry, though. The movie didn't miss that; you missed the point.
Steel_Wind said:
It missed out on the Dursleys.
Not really. The Dursley's pretty much do the exact same routine year after year, at least until we get into books five and six, where there's hints of development.
Although the Dursley interaction with the ton-tongue toffee was my favorite of the bunch, I can definately see cutting it in movie. It is a bit superfluous--the other three movies have all shown the Dursley's getting their "beginning of the school year magical discomfiture"(TM) quite well. I'd love to see the Weasley's blast through their living room as a deleted scene, though.
Steel_Wind said:
And the movie seems rushed without any real feel for the school year at all.
My wife said that too, but I don't know that any of the movies ever really made me feel like it was a school year, so I'm not sure that I agree that that makes any sense to complain about, really. This movie really did have to rush--the book is some 750 or so pages long. I think they did a great job of rushing without feeling rushed, though--and if sacrificing classroom scenes that--again--are pretty superfluous at this point unless something really significant is happening--then I can certainly accept that.
Steel_Wind said:
Sorry. Best Evar? Not even close.
I disagree. Best Harry Potter movie to date, by a
loooong shot. Prisoner of Azkaban was probably the one that disappointed me the most, although I think it's a better movie than 1&2. The resolution of it felt rushed and empty compared to the same scenes in the book. And Professor Lupin as the werewolf looked silly. That was a big disappointment in the same season where we'd just seen the Van Helsing werewolves.
Of course, the look of the werewolves in Van Helsing was one of the few bright points in that movie.