D&D General Hasbro CEO Says AI Integration Has Been "A Clear Success"

However "people make the decisions and people own the creative outcomes".
Copy of Copy of Copy of pODCAST358-fr (11).png


We've known for some time that Hasbro CEO--and former president of Wizards of the Coast--Chris Cocks is an avid AI supporter and enthusiast. He previously noted that of the 30-40 people he games with regularly, "there's not a single person who doesn't use AI somehow for either campaign development or character development or story ideas." In a 2025 interview he described himself as an "AI bull".

In Hasbro's latest earnings call, Cocks briefly addressed the use of AI within the company. While he mentions Hasbro, Wizards of the Coast and the digital studio teams, he doesn't specifically namecheck Dungeons & Dragons. However, he does tout Hasbro's AI integration as a "clear success", referring primarily to non-creative operations such as finances, supply chains, and general productivity enhancements, and emphasises that "people make the decisions and people own the creative outcomes". He also notes that individual teams choose whether or not to use AI.

So while it is clear that AI is deeply embedded in Hasbro's workflows, it is not clear to what extent that applies to Dungeons & Dragons. WotC has indicated multiple times that it will not use AI artwork, and its freelance contracts explicitly prohibit its use. The company also removed AI-generated artwork in 2023's Bigby's Presents: Glory of the Giants.

Before I close, I want to address AI, and how we're using it at Hasbro. We're taking a human-centric creator-led approach. AI is a tool that helps our teams move faster and focus on higher-value work, but people make the decisions and people own the creative outcomes. Teams also have choice in how they use it, including not to use it at all when it doesn't fit the work or the brand. We're beyond experimentation. We're deploying AI across financial planning, forecasting, order management, supply chain operations, training and everyday productivity. Under enterprise controls and clear guidelines around responsible use and IP protection. Anyone who knows me knows I'm an enthusiastic AI user and that mindset extends across the enterprise. We're partnering with best-in-class platforms, including Google Gemini, OpenAI and 11 labs to embed AI into workflows where it adds real value. The impact is tangible. Over the next year, we anticipate these workflows will free up more than 1 million hours of lower-value work, and we're reinvesting that capacity into innovation, creativity and serving fans. Our portfolio of IP and the creators and talent behind it are the foundation of this strategy. Great IP plus great storytelling is durable as technology evolves, and it positions us to benefit from disruption rather than being displaced by it.

In toys, AI-assisted design, paired with 3D printing has fundamentally improved our process. We've reduced time from concept to physical prototype by roughly 80%, enabling faster iteration and more experimentation with human judgment and human craft determining what ultimately gets selected and turned into a final product. We believe the winners in AI will be companies that combine deep IP, creative talent and disciplined deployment. That's exactly where Hasbro sits. As we enter 2026, we view playing to Win and more importantly, the execution behind it by our Hasbro, Wizards of the Coast and digital studio teams as a clear success.
- Chris Cocks, Hasbro CEO​

Wizards of the Coast's most recent statement on AI said "For 50 years, D&D has been built on the innovation, ingenuity, and hard work of talented people who sculpt a beautiful, creative game. That isn't changing. Our internal guidelines remain the same with regards to artificial intelligence tools: We require artists, writers, and creatives contributing to the D&D TTRPG to refrain from using AI generative tools to create final D&D products. We work with some of the most talented artists and creatives in the world, and we believe those people are what makes D&D great."

A small survey of about 500 users right here on EN World in April 2025 indicated that just over 60% of users would not buy D&D products made with AI.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



It's gotten to the point where Executives feel obliged to say that they're deploying "AI" for "efficiency gains" in a fear of Investors thinking they're not serious about cost-saving.

We have passed the stage of "CEOs trying to burn boatloads of money in an attempt to find the killer app" and reached the stage of "Uhm our employees have ChatGPT, Gemini which will save bajillion hours of low skill work, probably, maybe". Performative AI.
 



It's notable that the wording here is extremely careful.

All the actual examples given are ones that consumers don't really care about - "financial planning, forecasting, order management, supply chain operations, training and everyday productivity".

But they're clearly using it in ways other than those because they say "Under enterprise controls and clear guidelines around responsible use and IP protection", which like, you wouldn't need if the listed uses were the only ones. You only really need "responsible use" and "IP protection" if you're using AI in creative stuff. Which people don't like.
 


The assertion that everyone he knows uses AI in their campaigns seems laughable... looking at the two campaigns I am in quite a few people use AI for character art, but little else. I've used copilot to shorten a few long character backstories.

However, it has always been a struggle to get anyone to take notes. Two weeks ago, I decided to give one of the AI generated session summarizers a try (SessionKeeper). The results were... mixed. If all you need is a paragraph or so summary of what happened, it does a decent job--maybe a detail or two that are off. The more detailed description flat out hallucinates or misinterprets events, sometimes to hilarious results.

But then it provides summaries tailored to each player, and my players tell me it makes some stuff up, mixes up who did what, and even judges them for their play styles and tactical choices! We've had a laugh about it and it's fairly useful (and I can see the potential), the amount of faith large companies are putting in this technology really seems overly optimistic.
 

It's notable that the wording here is extremely careful.

All the actual examples given are ones that consumers don't really care about - "financial planning, forecasting, order management, supply chain operations, training and everyday productivity".

But they're clearly using it in ways other than those because they say "Under enterprise controls and clear guidelines around responsible use and IP protection", which like, you wouldn't need if the listed uses were the only ones. You only really need "responsible use" and "IP protection" if you're using AI in creative stuff. Which people don't like.
One of the AI ads during the Super Bowl was pretty much exactly targeting drudge office work. 'AI can finish out that 1000 row spreadsheet in just a few minutes.' 'AI can build that 100 slide power point.' 'AI can create the emails for the layoff notices(*).'
(*)this one wasn't in the ad spot but doesn't take much imagination to picture happening. Have to pay for AI costs somehow.

Waiting for the first product that was play tested solely by AI test bots.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top