Hypersmurf
Moderatarrrrh...
Altalazar said:With 3E Haste, there would be no question that a zombie could act normally. It added an extra action, and once you have the chance to do two standard actions in a round, you are up to what you normally have - in fact, it is even better. Normally, you can only get two actions in a round and one HAS to be movement. Under your 3E theory, you'd get BETTER than that - two actions and NEITHER has to be movement (though obviously they could be). So you could do a full round action in those circumstances.
Only a miscellaneous full round action.
Under normal circumstances, you could take a standard action (which was essentially a partial action plus a move or move-equivalent action), or a full round action.
The Zombie is restricted to a partial action.
Haste provided an extra partial action.
So a Hasted Zombie had two partial actions. The only way he could take a full round action would be to use his two partial actions to take the Start Full Round Action action and the Complete Full Round Action action... which would allow him to effectively undertake any miscellaneous full round action.
However, any full round action which was not a miscellaneous full round action, he could not take. And that includes Full Attack, which was an attack action, not a miscellaneous action.
So he could take two attack partial actions, but not a single full attack action.
Just because two partial actions lets you do something you couldn't normally do (like, say, attack once and cast a one-action spell) doesn't mean you can make up new rules about combining partial actions to make a non-miscellaneous full round action.
Let's say I normally have a choice of one-and-a-half oranges, or a banana.
Today, my choice was removed, and I was given a single orange. But I was lucky, and I found another orange.
Now I have two oranges. That's better than one-and-a-half oranges!
But it doesn't help if what I want is a banana.
Normally, in 3E, someone had a choice of a standard action (a partial action plus a move or move-equivalent action), or a full round action.
A Zombie doesn't get that choice - he can only take a partial action. But he's hasted, so he gets another partial action.
Now he has two partial actions! That's better than a partial action and a move action!
But it doesn't help if what he wants is a (non-miscellaneous) full round action.
Two partial actions is indisputably better than a standard action. But it is not necessarily better than a choice of a standard action or a full round action, because sometimes it's the full round action you want to take.
Your interpretation of 3.5E Haste is one possible interpretation, but without an official answer, your answer is not any more official than mine. Once I get the official answer I'll post it to this thread and we can then compare to what the Sage thinks. The reason I think your answer doesn't work as well is because it doesn't take into account the circumstances, but instead just blindly tries to apply the base mechanic to circumstances that don't support it, something that generally speaking is not how the rules are usually interpreted by the sage. But thanks for the input.
What circumstances that don't support it?
The zombie is a creature; it is not affected by a Slow spell; thus Haste has the effect dictated in the spell description for targeting a creature that is not affected by a Slow spell.
-Hyp.
Last edited: